FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II
Illiquid Assets: formula sheet
Key formulas
- Liquidity premium
- Liquidity premium ≈ Expected return (illiquid asset) − Expected return (comparable liquid asset)
- Compensation for illiquidity. Compare assets with similar cash flow risk.
- Net return after transaction costs
- Net return ≈ Gross return − (Round-trip cost ÷ Holding period in years)
- Costs matter less the longer you hold. Illiquid assets suit long holding periods.
- Round-trip cost from a spread
- Round-trip cost = Bid-ask spread ÷ Mid price (one full buy and sell)
- Half-spread is the cost of one side only. Check whether the question wants one-way or round-trip.
- Smoothed (appraisal) return
- R(reported, t) = α × R(true, t) + (1 − α) × R(reported, t−1), with 0 < α ≤ 1
- One common smoothing model. Smaller α means more smoothing and more understated volatility.
- Volatility effect of smoothing
- σ(reported) < σ(true) when 0 < α < 1
- Reported returns are autocorrelated. Reported risk is biased down.
- Smoothing model
- r(t) = (1 − α) × r*(t) + α × r(t−1)
- r(t) is the reported return, r*(t) the true return, α the smoothing parameter between 0 and 1. A larger α means more smoothing.
- Geltner unsmoothing
- r*(t) = [r(t) − α × r(t−1)] ÷ (1 − α)
- You lose the first observation because it has no prior return. Use α estimated from the data.
- Estimating α
- α ≈ ρ1, the first-order autocorrelation of reported returns
- Works when true returns are roughly uncorrelated over time and smoothing is first order.
- Volatility adjustment
- σ* ≈ σ(reported) × √[(1 + α) ÷ (1 − α)]
- Holds if true returns are independent over time. Since the factor exceeds 1, true volatility is higher than reported.
- Reported variance under smoothing
- σ²(reported) = σ*² × (1 − α) ÷ (1 + α)
- The same relationship rearranged. It shows how much variance smoothing removes.
- Liquidity premium
- Liquidity premium = E(R illiquid) − E(R comparable liquid asset)
- Compare assets with similar cash-flow and credit risk. Otherwise you also capture other risk premiums.
- Required return on illiquid asset
- Required return = Risk-free rate + Market risk premium + Liquidity premium
- Use this as the discount rate when valuing illiquid cash flows. A higher premium lowers present value.
- Unsmoothing returns (Geltner, first-order)
- r(true,t) = [r(obs,t) − φ × r(obs,t−1)] ÷ (1 − φ)
- φ is the smoothing (autocorrelation) parameter, with 0 ≤ φ < 1. It is often estimated from first-order autocorrelation.
- Volatility after unsmoothing
- σ(true) ≈ σ(obs) × √[(1 + φ) ÷ (1 − φ)] ... approximately, for a first-order smoothing process
- Unsmoothed volatility is higher than observed. Higher φ means a bigger correction.
- Illiquidity-adjusted Sharpe ratio
- Sharpe = (R − Rf) ÷ σ
- Use unsmoothed σ. Using reported σ overstates the ratio.
- Liquidity-adjusted VaR
- LVaR = VaR + ½ × Position value × Bid-ask spread
- Exogenous spread cost for liquidating a position. Useful for tradable but less liquid assets.
- Smoothed (appraisal) return
- r(reported,t) = (1 − α) × r(true,t) + α × r(reported,t−1)
- α is the smoothing weight between 0 and 1. Higher α means more stale pricing.
- Unsmoothing
- r(true,t) = [r(reported,t) − α × r(reported,t−1)] ÷ (1 − α)
- Rearranged from the line above. Needs α below 1.
- Effect of smoothing on volatility
- σ(reported) < σ(true), and the Sharpe ratio is overstated
- Autocorrelation in reported returns is a warning sign. This is the general direction, not an exact ratio.
- Secondary market discount
- Price = NAV × (1 − discount)
- Discount = (NAV − price) ÷ NAV. It widens in stress.
- Unfunded commitment
- Unfunded = Total commitment − Capital called to date
- Treat it as a contingent liquidity outflow.
- Gate payout
- Paid per investor = Requested × (Gate amount ÷ Total requested)
- Applies when requests exceed the gate and the fund prorates. Check the fund's terms.
- Total illiquid exposure
- Illiquid exposure = NAV of illiquid assets + unfunded commitments
- Use this for limits and stress tests, not NAV alone.
- Stressed liquidity coverage
- Coverage = stressed liquid assets ÷ stressed cash needs
- Below 1 means a shortfall and a risk of forced sales.
- Stressed net cash need
- Net need = spending + capital calls − distributions
- In a crisis, assume calls higher and distributions lower.
- Illiquid share of portfolio
- Illiquid share = illiquid NAV ÷ total portfolio value
- Rises when liquid assets fall; this is the denominator effect.
- Liquid assets after stress
- Liquid after = liquid assets × (1 − market shock) − net cash need
- Check this stays positive over the horizon.
Quick revision
- Illiquid assets are costly or slow to sell without a price concession.
- Smoothed returns show positive autocorrelation.
- Smoothing understates volatility, and often understates correlation with liquid markets.
- Understated risk makes the Sharpe ratio look better than it really is.
- Unsmoothing should raise estimated volatility compared with reported volatility.
- Appraisal-based and stale prices are common causes of smoothing.
- A liquidity premium is extra expected return for bearing illiquidity.
- Lockups, gates and notice periods limit an investor's ability to exit.
- Private equity investors face capital calls, so they need liquid reserves.
- Illiquidity risk is greatest in stress, when selling and funding needs coincide.
- Match illiquid allocations to liabilities and spending horizons.
- Always state the measure, the method and the interpretation in your answer.
Common mistakes
- Treating reported volatility of private assets as true risk. Fix: Remember appraisal smoothing biases volatility and correlation down. Unsmooth before using the data in risk models.
- Saying the liquidity premium is a guaranteed extra return. Fix: It is expected compensation for bearing illiquidity risk. Realised returns can be lower, especially in a crisis.
- Saying smoothing lowers the average return. Fix: Smoothing mainly changes the timing and variability of returns. The long-run average is not the main effect. The distortion is in volatility, correlation, beta and Sharpe ratio.
- Dividing reported volatility by √[(1 + α) ÷ (1 − α)] instead of multiplying. Fix: True volatility is larger. Multiply by √[(1 + α) ÷ (1 − α)], which is greater than 1 for positive α.
- Using reported volatility of private assets as true risk Fix: Unsmooth first. Expect higher volatility, higher correlation with equities and a lower Sharpe ratio.
- Treating the whole excess return as a liquidity premium Fix: Compare with a liquid asset of similar risk, or remove the market risk component first.
- Saying the J-curve means private equity loses money overall. Fix: The J-curve is a timing pattern. Fees and write-downs come first, gains arrive later.
- Ignoring unfunded commitments when assessing liquidity. Fix: Add unfunded commitments as contingent cash outflows in any liquidity stress.
- Measuring illiquid exposure by NAV only. Fix: Add unfunded commitments to NAV when judging total exposure and liquidity needs.
- Assuming distributions continue in a crisis. Fix: Assume lower distributions and sometimes higher calls in stress scenarios.
Exam tips
- Expect scenario questions: given an asset description, name the liquidity feature and its risk effect.
- Know the direction of bias: smoothing lowers volatility and correlation and raises the apparent Sharpe ratio.
- In cost questions, check one-way versus round-trip and annualise by holding period.
- Pick answers that call the liquidity premium compensation, not a free or certain return.
- Link this topic to liquidity-adjusted VaR: illiquid positions need a longer liquidation horizon.
- Expect questions that give autocorrelation and ask for corrected volatility, Sharpe ratio or VaR. Memorise the square-root factor.
- Know the direction of every effect: volatility, correlation and beta go up after unsmoothing; Sharpe ratio goes down.
- In conceptual questions, link the cause (appraisal-based, stale pricing) to the evidence (positive autocorrelation) and then to the risk consequence.