Skip to content

IAI Actuarial Core Principles · Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis

Mortality Projection for IAI CS2: Study Guide

Mortality projection means forecasting how death rates will change in future, usually by age and year. You study past trends, fit a model such as Lee-Carter or CBD, project its time-varying parameters, and allow for uncertainty. To solve questions, state the model, its assumptions, the fitting method and the projected result.

What this chapter covers

This chapter is about forecasting future mortality. Life tables and survival models in earlier chapters assume rates are fixed. In practice, death rates have fallen over time, so a pensioner aged 65 today is likely to live longer than the table suggests. Mortality projection builds that change into your calculations.

The chapter moves from ideas to models. You first look at observed trends and the drivers behind them. You then compare broad approaches: extrapolation, explanation and expectation. After that you meet the main stochastic models: Lee-Carter, age-period-cohort (APC) and the Cairns-Blake-Dowd (CBD) family. Last comes uncertainty in the fitted parameters and how to simulate projections.

The chapter links to several other parts of the paper. It uses generalised linear models, time series and ARIMA ideas to project the period index. It uses simulation and parameter estimation. It also ties to CM1 and the actuarial work on annuities and pensions, where longevity risk is a real cost. Expect both written questions on concepts and, in Paper B, practical fitting with R.

Mortality projection is a favourite topic for written questions because it mixes theory, judgement and calculation. You may be asked to describe a model, list its weaknesses, interpret fitted parameters, or compare approaches for a pension scheme or annuity book. Marks come from clear structure and correct notation, so a prepared student can score well. The chapter also helps in Paper B, where you may fit a model and comment on output. Time spent here also reinforces time series and simulation, which are examined elsewhere in the paper.

Mortality projection: topics in the order to study them

  1. 1Mortality Trends and Drivers of ImprovementStart with the real-world picture of falling mortality, since every model is built to capture these patterns.
  2. 2Approaches to Mortality ProjectionNext learn the broad methods and their pros and cons, which gives you a frame for judging each specific model.
  3. 3Lee-Carter ModelThis is the core one-factor model, and you need it before the extensions that build on its structure.
  4. 4Age-Period-Cohort and CBD ModelsStudy these after Lee-Carter so you can compare them, especially on cohort effects and age structure.
  5. 5Parameter Uncertainty and Stochastic ProjectionsFinish with uncertainty and simulation, which apply to every model you have learned.

How to prepare Mortality projection

Treat this chapter as a mix of definitions, model structure and judgement. Build each model from its equation, then practise explaining it in words.

  1. Read the trends and drivers topic once and write a short list of causes of improvement and risks to them, such as medical advances, lifestyle change and lower infant deaths.
  2. Make a one-page comparison of extrapolation, explanation and expectation approaches, with one strength and one weakness each.
  3. Write out the Lee-Carter equation in standard notation, say what each term means, and note the identifiability constraints. Practise stating them without notes.
  4. Learn how the period index is projected, typically as a time series such as a random walk with drift, and what that implies for forecast variance.
  5. Compare APC and CBD models in a table of your own: structure, number of parameters, treatment of cohorts, and weaknesses.
  6. Work through sources of uncertainty: parameter, process and model risk. Practise explaining how simulation produces a fan of projections.
  7. Do past-paper written questions under time, then repeat any R fitting tasks so you can produce output and comment on it.

Common mistakes in Mortality projection

  • Writing the Lee-Carter equation without defining each term or stating constraints.

    Fix: Write the equation, then one line for a(x), b(x) and k(t), and state the constraints that make the model identifiable.

  • Treating projection as a single forecast with no uncertainty.

    Fix: Always mention parameter, process and model risk and say how simulation shows the spread of outcomes.

  • Confusing the age-period-cohort model with Lee-Carter and attributing cohort effects to the wrong model.

    Fix: Remember that basic Lee-Carter has age and period terms only, while APC adds an explicit cohort term. Keep a short comparison note.

  • Giving a list of mortality drivers with no judgement about their future effect.

    Fix: For each driver, say whether it may continue, slow or reverse, and how that affects the choice of projection method.

  • Ignoring the reliability of the time series chosen for the period index.

    Fix: State the time series model, its assumptions and what it implies for forecast variance over the horizon.

  • Giving only output in Paper B without comment.

    Fix: Check residuals, comment on fit and plausibility, and state the assumptions behind the projection.

Last-day revision: Mortality projection

  • Mortality improvement means death rates fall over calendar time, and the pace can differ by age and cohort.
  • Three broad approaches: extrapolation, explanation and expectation. Extrapolation is the most used in practice.
  • Lee-Carter: ln(m(x,t)) = a(x) + b(x) × k(t) + error, with a(x) the average age pattern.
  • In Lee-Carter, b(x) shows how much each age responds to change in k(t), and k(t) is the period index.
  • Lee-Carter needs constraints to be identifiable, such as Σb(x) = 1 and Σk(t) = 0.
  • k(t) is often projected as a random walk with drift, so uncertainty widens as the horizon grows.
  • Lee-Carter has no cohort effect in its basic form, which can leave patterns in residuals.
  • APC models add a cohort term γ(t − x) to age and period effects.
  • The CBD model is designed for older ages and uses two period indices, one for level and one for slope with age.
  • Parameter uncertainty comes from estimation, process risk from random deaths, and model risk from choosing the wrong form.
  • Stochastic projection by simulation gives a distribution of future rates, not a single best estimate.
  • Always state assumptions, such as the fitting period, age range and the time series model used for the period index.

Mortality projection practice questions

Mortality projection: frequently asked questions

Is mortality projection part of CS2?

Yes, it is part of the CS2 Risk Modelling and Survival Analysis syllabus, linked to survival models and time series. Check the current IAI syllabus for the exact scope in your session.

Do I need to memorise the Lee-Carter formula?

Yes. You should be able to write it in standard notation, explain each term, and state the constraints. Questions often ask you to describe the model or comment on its weaknesses.

Which models matter most for this chapter?

Lee-Carter is the core model, so learn it first and best. Then be able to compare it with age-period-cohort and CBD models, including what each can and cannot capture.

Can this chapter appear in the computer-based paper?

It can, since fitting and projecting models in R is a natural practical task. Practise producing output, checking fit and writing a short comment on what the results mean.