Skip to content

Financial Reporting · Consolidated Financial Statements

Ind AS 110 Scope and Control Concept: Three Elements of Control

Updated 5 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Ind AS 110 requires a parent to prepare consolidated financial statements. An investor controls an investee when it has power over the investee, exposure or rights to variable returns, and the ability to use its power to affect those returns. To solve a question, test each element in order and conclude.

Understand Ind AS 110 Scope and Control Concept

Ind AS 110 has one objective: to set principles for presenting and preparing consolidated financial statements when an entity controls one or more other entities. The group is shown as if it were a single economic entity.

The key terms are simple. A parent is an entity that controls one or more entities. A subsidiary is an entity that is controlled by another entity. Consolidated financial statements are the financial statements of a group in which the assets, liabilities, equity, income, expenses and cash flows of the parent and its subsidiaries are presented as those of a single economic entity.

The whole standard rests on control. An investor controls an investee only if it has all three elements together: (a) power over the investee, (b) exposure, or rights, to variable returns from its involvement, and (c) the ability to use its power to affect the amount of those returns (the link). If any one element is missing, there is no control and no consolidation under this standard.

Power means existing rights that give the current ability to direct the relevant activities, that is, the activities that significantly affect the investee's returns. Only substantive rights count. A right is substantive if the holder has the practical ability to exercise it. Protective rights are designed to protect the holder's interest without giving power, for example a lender's right to stop the borrower changing its business. Protective rights alone do not give power.

The parent consolidates all its subsidiaries, including those with a different business or in another country, subject to the exemptions covered in other topics (for example the exemption from presenting consolidated statements for certain parents and the investment entity exception). Control is reassessed whenever facts and circumstances indicate a change in any of the three elements.

Key rules to remember

Definition of control
Control = Power over investee + Exposure/rights to variable returns + Ability to use power to affect returns
All three must be present. Missing any one means no control.
Power
Power = Existing rights giving current ability to direct relevant activities
Rights must be substantive. Protective rights alone do not give power. Rights need not have been exercised.
Variable returns
Returns that vary with the investee's performance (positive, negative or both)
Examples: dividends, fee income, residual interests, exposure to loss, cost savings, synergies. Fixed-interest returns can still be variable if exposed to credit risk.
Link between power and returns
Principal (acts for itself) vs Agent (acts for others)
A decision maker who is an agent does not control. Assess scope of authority, rights held by others, remuneration and exposure to variability from other interests.
Reassessment
Reassess control if facts indicate a change in one or more of the three elements
Control is not assessed once and forgotten.

How to solve Ind AS 110 Scope and Control Concept questions

Use the same structure for any control question: identify the investee, test the three elements in order, and give a clear conclusion with reasons.

  1. 11. Understand the purpose and design of the investee: what it does, who set it up and how decisions are made.
  2. 22. Identify the relevant activities, the ones that significantly affect returns, and who directs them (voting rights, board control, contracts).
  3. 33. Test power: list the rights held by the investor and others. Separate substantive rights from protective rights. Consider potential voting rights only if substantive.
  4. 44. Test variable returns: check whether the investor is exposed to variability through dividends, fees, residual interest, guarantees or losses.
  5. 55. Test the link: if the investor is a decision maker, decide whether it is a principal or an agent.
  6. 66. Conclude explicitly: control exists only if all three elements are met. State the parent and subsidiary, and that consolidation is required.
  7. 77. Mention reassessment if the facts change during the year.

Quickest way: Three-box check

When to use it: Use this for MCQs and short case scenarios where you have only a few minutes.

  1. Draw three boxes: Power, Returns, Link.
  2. Tick Power only if the investor can direct the relevant activities through substantive rights. Ignore protective rights.
  3. Tick Returns if the investor's return varies with investee performance.
  4. Tick Link if the investor acts for itself and not as an agent.
  5. Three ticks mean control, so consolidate. Any blank box means no control. Write the conclusion in one line with the reason.

Common mistakes in Ind AS 110 Scope and Control Concept

  • Assuming control exists only when the investor holds more than 50% of voting rights.

    Students carry over the old idea of majority ownership.

    Fix: Majority votes usually give power, but control is a three-element test. Power can arise without a majority, and a majority may give no power if the rights are not substantive.

  • Treating protective rights as power.

    Rights such as veto on borrowing look strong.

    Fix: Ask if the right lets the holder direct relevant activities. If it only protects the holder's interest, it is protective and gives no power.

  • Checking only power and ignoring variable returns and the link.

    The question seems to focus on voting rights.

    Fix: Always complete all three boxes in the answer, even briefly.

  • Concluding that a fund manager or other decision maker controls the investee without checking principal versus agent.

    The manager has wide decision rights.

    Fix: Check remuneration, removal rights held by others and other interests held. An agent does not control.

  • Saying that returns must be positive or fixed.

    Students think of returns only as dividends.

    Fix: Returns can be positive, negative or both, and include fees, residual interests and exposure to losses.

  • Treating the control assessment as permanent.

    Students forget that facts can change.

    Fix: State that control is reassessed when facts show a change in any of the three elements.

Worked examples

Example 1

Alpha Ltd holds 40% of the voting rights of Beta Ltd. The remaining 60% is held by 600 unrelated shareholders, none holding more than 0.5%, and they have never attended a meeting together. Alpha has attended and won every vote on appointing directors for the past five years, and it is entitled to its share of Beta's dividends, which depend on Beta's profits. Does Alpha control Beta?

Show the solution
  1. Relevant activities: Beta's operating and financing decisions, directed through the board, which the shareholders appoint by vote.
  2. Power: Alpha holds 40% and the other holders are widely dispersed and have never organised to vote. Alpha's votes are enough in practice to direct the board, so its voting rights are substantive and give it the current ability to direct relevant activities.
  3. Variable returns: Alpha receives dividends that vary with Beta's profits, so it is exposed to variable returns.
  4. Link: Alpha votes for itself as shareholder and not as an agent, so it can use its power to affect its returns.
  5. All three elements are met.

Answer: Alpha controls Beta, even though it holds less than 50% of the votes. Beta is a subsidiary of Alpha and Alpha must consolidate it.

Example 2

Sigma Asset Managers Ltd manages Fund X for a fixed fee of 1% of net assets. It holds no units of the fund. Investors, who are many and unrelated, can remove Sigma without cause by a simple majority vote. Sigma sets the investment strategy within a mandate. Should Sigma consolidate Fund X?

Show the solution
  1. Power: Sigma has decision-making authority over the relevant activities, but this alone does not show control. It must decide if it is a principal or an agent.
  2. Scope of authority: Sigma works within a defined mandate, which limits its discretion.
  3. Rights held by others: Investors can remove Sigma without cause by simple majority, which is a strong sign that Sigma is an agent.
  4. Remuneration: A fixed 1% fee is commensurate with the services and is not highly variable.
  5. Other interests: Sigma holds no units, so it has no exposure to variability beyond the fee.
  6. Together these factors show Sigma acts on behalf of the investors.

Answer: Sigma is an agent, not a principal, so the link between power and returns is missing. Sigma does not control Fund X and does not consolidate it.

Exam tips

  • In case scenarios, quote the facts that decide each element, such as removal rights, dispersed holdings or fee structure. Marks go for application, not recitation.
  • Always name the three elements and end with a clear conclusion on control and consolidation.
  • For MCQs on rights, first ask whether they are substantive or protective. This removes two options quickly.
  • When the investor is a decision maker, expect a principal versus agent test. Look for removal rights and other interests.
  • Do not state ownership percentages as the only test. Show that control is judged on all facts.

Practice questions from Consolidated Financial Statements

Ind AS 110 Scope and Control Concept in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Ind AS 110 Scope and Control Concept: frequently asked questions

What are the three elements of control in Ind AS 110?

They are power over the investee, exposure or rights to variable returns from involvement with it, and the ability to use power to affect the amount of those returns. All three must be present for control.

What is the difference between substantive and protective rights?

Substantive rights give the holder the practical ability to exercise them and can give power. Protective rights only safeguard the holder's interest, such as a lender's covenants, and do not give power over the investee.

Can an entity control another with less than 50% voting rights?

Yes. If the other holders are dispersed and passive, or there are other contractual rights, an investor with fewer than half the votes may still have the current ability to direct the relevant activities. The three-element test decides this.

Who must prepare consolidated financial statements?

A parent must prepare them, unless it qualifies for a specific exemption in the standard, such as being itself wholly or partly owned by another entity that prepares such statements, or being an investment entity. The control test decides who is a parent.