Financial Reporting · Ind AS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors
Changes in Accounting Policies under Ind AS 8 (CA Final)
Updated 5 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Under Ind AS 8, you may change an accounting policy only if an Ind AS requires it or the change gives reliable and more relevant information. Apply it retrospectively: adjust opening equity of the earliest period presented and restate comparatives, unless impracticable. If impracticable, apply from the earliest date practicable. Disclose the effects.
Understand Changes in Accounting Policies
An accounting policy is the specific principles, bases, conventions, rules and practices an entity applies in preparing financial statements. Examples are weighted average versus FIFO for inventory, or cost model versus revaluation model for PPE. Users compare statements over time, so Ind AS 8 does not let you switch policies freely.
You may change a policy in only two cases. First, an Ind AS requires the change. Second, the change results in financial statements that give reliable and more relevant information about the effects of transactions on the entity's financial position, performance or cash flows. A wish to show higher profit is not a valid reason.
The core idea of retrospective application is simple: show the numbers as if the new policy had always been used. You adjust the opening balance of each affected component of equity (usually retained earnings) for the earliest prior period presented. You also restate the other comparative amounts for each prior period presented.
When the change is due to initial application of an Ind AS, follow that standard's transitional provisions. If it has none, apply retrospectively. Voluntary changes are applied retrospectively, subject to the impracticability limits. Some things are not changes in policy: a different policy for transactions that differ in substance from earlier ones, and a policy for transactions that did not occur before or were immaterial. The first adoption of the revaluation model for PPE or intangibles is also not treated under Ind AS 8. It is handled as a revaluation under Ind AS 16 or Ind AS 38.
Retrospective application has a limit. If you cannot do it after making every reasonable effort, it is impracticable. Then you apply the new policy as far back as is practicable, and in the worst case only prospectively. If it is hard to tell whether a change is a policy change or an estimate change, treat it as a change in estimate.
Key rules to remember
- Conditions for a voluntary change
- Change allowed if: (a) required by an Ind AS, or (b) gives reliable and more relevant information
- Write both limbs in theory answers. Convenience or a profit target is not a valid reason.
- Default rule: retrospective application
- Opening equity adjustment = Cumulative effect (new policy − old policy) on periods before the earliest period presented
- Adjust the opening balance of the affected equity component. Restate comparatives as if the new policy had always applied.
- Effect on profit of each presented year
- Profit effect = Change in closing item − Change in opening item (for inventory: higher closing stock raises profit, higher opening stock lowers it)
- Compute it year by year for a restated comparative.
- Transitional provisions of a new Ind AS
- Specific transition in the Ind AS applies; if none, retrospective
- Applies when the change comes from initial application of an Ind AS.
- Impracticability: period-specific effects
- If period-specific effects cannot be determined: apply the new policy to carrying amounts at the start of the earliest period for which retrospective application is practicable (may be the current period) and adjust opening equity of that period
- Comparatives before that date are not restated.
- Impracticability: cumulative effect
- If the cumulative effect at the start of the current period cannot be determined: apply prospectively from the earliest date practicable
- No restatement of earlier periods at all.
How to solve Changes in Accounting Policies questions
Use this order for any question on a change in accounting policy, whether it is theory or numerical.
- 1Decide whether it is a change in policy. Check if it is a change in estimate, a prior period error, or a policy for new or substantively different transactions. These are treated differently.
- 2Test whether the change is allowed: required by an Ind AS, or gives reliable and more relevant information. If neither, it is not permitted.
- 3Identify the transition rule. If the change arises from a new Ind AS with transitional provisions, follow them. Otherwise apply retrospectively.
- 4Check practicability. If you lack data to compute period-specific or cumulative effects, apply the impracticability limits: earliest practicable date, or prospective.
- 5Compute the cumulative effect on opening equity at the start of the earliest period presented, then the effect on each presented year's profit.
- 6Restate the comparatives and adjust opening retained earnings. Include the tax effect where the facts give a tax rate.
- 7Disclose: nature of the change, reason it gives reliable and more relevant information, amount of adjustment for each line item and for EPS, and the amount relating to periods before those presented. Mention a third balance sheet when Ind AS 1 requires it.
Quickest way: Table of old versus new, year by year
When to use it: Use for numerical questions with data under both policies for several years.
- List the item (for example closing inventory) under the old and new policy for each date. Take the difference (new − old).
- The difference at the start of the earliest period presented is the opening retained earnings adjustment.
- For each presented year, profit effect = difference at year end − difference at year start (for inventory).
- Check: opening adjustment + profit effects of all years = cumulative difference at the latest balance sheet date.
- Write the one-line reason for the change and the disclosure points in two or three bullets.
Common mistakes in Changes in Accounting Policies
Treating a change in depreciation method or useful life as a change in policy.
Depreciation sounds like a policy choice.
Fix: Ind AS 8 treats a change in depreciation method as a change in estimate, applied prospectively. Policy changes cover recognition, measurement basis and presentation choices.
Adjusting the current year profit instead of opening retained earnings for the earlier periods.
Students forget the 'as if always applied' idea.
Fix: Put the cumulative effect up to the start of the earliest period presented into opening retained earnings. Only the presented years' effects go through their own profit.
Applying the change prospectively because it is easier.
Confusion with change in estimate.
Fix: Prospective application is allowed only when retrospective is impracticable, or when a standard's transition says so.
Giving 'higher profit' or 'convenience' as the reason for a voluntary change.
Students do not memorise the allowed conditions.
Fix: State the condition: the change gives reliable and more relevant information. Say why with the facts.
Calling impracticability a matter of cost or effort.
Ordinary meaning of the word.
Fix: It means the entity cannot apply the requirement after making every reasonable effort, for example needed data was not collected or the effects need hindsight.
Forgetting disclosures such as the line-item adjustment and EPS effect, and the third balance sheet.
Students stop after the numbers.
Fix: Close every answer with a short disclosure list. Refer to Ind AS 1 for the balance sheet at the start of the preceding period when the retrospective effect is material.
Worked examples
Example 1
Alpha Ltd has used weighted average for inventory. From 2026-27 it voluntarily changes to FIFO because it gives more relevant information. Closing inventory (₹) was: 31 March 2025 – weighted average 40,00,000, FIFO 42,00,000; 31 March 2026 – weighted average 50,00,000, FIFO 54,00,000; 31 March 2027 – weighted average 60,00,000, FIFO 63,00,000. Ignore tax. The financial statements for 2026-27 present 2025-26 as comparative. Show the effects of the change.
Show the solution
- Voluntary change, so the test is met: more relevant information. Apply retrospectively.
- Difference (FIFO − weighted average): 31 March 2025 = ₹2,00,000; 31 March 2026 = ₹4,00,000; 31 March 2027 = ₹3,00,000.
- The earliest period presented begins on 1 April 2025. Opening retained earnings at 1 April 2025 increase by ₹2,00,000.
- Profit effect for 2025-26 = 4,00,000 − 2,00,000 = ₹2,00,000 increase. Restate the 2025-26 comparative: closing inventory ₹54,00,000 and profit up by ₹2,00,000.
- Retained earnings at 31 March 2026 (restated) are higher by 2,00,000 + 2,00,000 = ₹4,00,000.
- Profit effect for 2026-27 = 3,00,000 − 4,00,000 = ₹1,00,000 decrease. Closing inventory at 31 March 2027 is ₹63,00,000.
- Check: 2,00,000 + 2,00,000 − 1,00,000 = ₹3,00,000, equal to the difference at 31 March 2027.
- Disclose the nature and reason, the adjustment for each affected line item and EPS, and the amount relating to periods before 2025-26. Present a third balance sheet at 1 April 2025 if the effect is material.
Answer: Opening retained earnings at 1 April 2025 rise by ₹2,00,000. Profit for 2025-26 is restated up by ₹2,00,000 and profit for 2026-27 is ₹1,00,000 lower than under the old policy. Closing inventory is ₹54,00,000 at 31 March 2026 and ₹63,00,000 at 31 March 2027.
Example 2
Using the data of Alpha Ltd, assume the records for 2025-26 are not available in a form that lets the company work out FIFO cost for each month of that year, so the period-specific effects for 2025-26 cannot be determined. FIFO cost of the 1 April 2026 inventory can be reliably determined as ₹54,00,000 (weighted average ₹50,00,000). Closing inventory at 31 March 2027 is ₹63,00,000 under FIFO and ₹60,00,000 under weighted average. Ignore tax. How should the company apply the change?
Show the solution
- The change is voluntary, so retrospective application is the default. Here period-specific effects for 2025-26 are impracticable to determine.
- Apply the new policy to the carrying amounts at the beginning of the earliest period for which retrospective application is practicable. That is 1 April 2026, the current period.
- Adjust opening retained earnings at 1 April 2026 by 54,00,000 − 50,00,000 = ₹4,00,000 increase. Do not restate the 2025-26 comparatives for this change.
- Profit effect for 2026-27 = closing difference 3,00,000 − opening difference 4,00,000 = ₹1,00,000 decrease. Closing inventory is ₹63,00,000.
- Disclose why the comparative information is not restated and from when the new policy applies, along with the nature and reason for the change.
Answer: Apply FIFO from 1 April 2026. Opening retained earnings at that date increase by ₹4,00,000 and the 2025-26 comparatives are not restated. Profit for 2026-27 is ₹1,00,000 lower than under the old policy and closing inventory is ₹63,00,000.
Exam tips
- Open any answer by stating whether the change is required by an Ind AS or gives reliable and more relevant information. This earns the easy marks.
- In numericals, show the opening equity adjustment, the restated comparative and the current year separately. Add the reconciling check.
- For case-scenario MCQs, first classify the item: policy change, estimate change, error, or a new type of transaction. Most wrong options come from misclassification.
- Know the impracticability ladder in order: full retrospective, then earliest practicable period, then prospective from the earliest date practicable.
- Link to Ind AS 1 for the third balance sheet and to Ind AS 33 for EPS disclosure in long answers.
Practice questions from Ind AS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors
- Veda Textiles Ltd's finance team is drafting its accounting policy note. A junior accountant defines 'accounting policies' for the notes. Wh…
- Kaveri Pharma Ltd. operates in India and prepares Ind AS financial statements. Ind AS has no standard that specifically applies to a transac…
- Godavari Foods Ltd's trainee states: 'Ind AS 8 uses the term Material in its own special way, defined separately within Ind AS 8.' The finan…
- Dakshin Foods Ltd is a company required to follow Ind AS. Its accountant is comparing Ind AS 8 with IAS 8 and makes four statements: (A) Ind…
- An audit associate at Mehra & Co. is reviewing Ind AS 8 for a client, Vihaan Pharma Ltd. A colleague claims that Ind AS 8 contains its own p…
Changes in Accounting Policies in other exams
The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.
Changes in Accounting Policies: frequently asked questions
When can an entity change an accounting policy under Ind AS 8?
Only when an Ind AS requires it, or when the change results in financial statements that provide reliable and more relevant information. Changes made for convenience or to improve reported profit are not allowed.
How is a change in accounting policy applied?
Retrospectively, as if the new policy had always been used. You adjust the opening balance of the affected equity component for the earliest prior period presented and restate comparatives. If the change arises from a new Ind AS with transitional provisions, those provisions apply.
What does impracticable mean in Ind AS 8?
It means the entity cannot apply a requirement after making every reasonable effort. This can happen when the data needed was not collected or the effects need hindsight about management intent. In that case, apply the policy from the earliest date practicable, which may be only prospectively.
Is a change in depreciation method a change in accounting policy?
No. Ind AS 8 treats a change in depreciation method as a change in accounting estimate, applied prospectively. Where you cannot tell a policy change from an estimate change, treat it as an estimate change.
Do I need a third balance sheet when I change a policy?
Ind AS 1 requires a balance sheet at the start of the preceding period when a retrospective application has a material effect on the information in it. Ind AS 8 itself only requires the disclosures of the adjustments.