Skip to content

Financial Reporting · Ind AS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors

Ind AS 8 Disclosures and Comparison with IAS 8

Updated 5 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Ind AS 8 requires you to disclose the nature of each policy change, estimate change or prior period error, plus the amount of adjustment for each affected line item and EPS, to the extent practicable. It also requires disclosure of Ind AS issued but not yet effective. Ind AS 8 closely mirrors IAS 8.

Understand Disclosures and Comparison with IAS 8

Ind AS 8 does not only tell you how to account for policy changes, estimate changes and errors. It also tells you what to tell the reader. Disclosure lets users see why numbers differ from last year and whether results are comparable.

The three areas have different disclosure logic. A policy change or an error is applied retrospectively, so prior periods are restated. The disclosure shows the effect on each financial statement line item and on earnings per share. A change in estimate is applied prospectively, so there is no restatement. The disclosure shows the nature and amount of the change, and its expected future effect.

The phrase to the extent practicable appears again and again. If you cannot work out the effect on a prior period, you do not invent it. You disclose the circumstances that made it impracticable and how and from when the change was applied. Disclosures of the same adjustment need not be repeated in later financial statements.

The standard also covers Ind AS issued but not yet effective. If you have not applied a new or amended Ind AS, you disclose that fact and the known or reasonably estimable information about its likely impact on first application. This is a forward-looking disclosure that warns users of coming changes.

For comparison, Ind AS 8 is substantially aligned with IAS 8. The core recognition, measurement and disclosure requirements are the same. Differences are mainly terminology: Ind AS and the Indian framework replace IFRS and the IASB framework. Do not claim a large carve-out in Ind AS 8. Cross-check any list of differences you memorise against the ICAI study material.

Key rules to remember

Voluntary change in accounting policy: disclosures
Nature of change + reasons why new policy is reliable and more relevant + adjustment for each line item (current and each prior period presented) + basic and diluted EPS + adjustment for periods before those presented
All amounts are 'to the extent practicable'. If retrospective application is impracticable, disclose the circumstances and how and from when the policy was applied.
Change in policy on initial application of an Ind AS: disclosures
Title of the Ind AS + that the change follows its transitional provisions (if so) + nature of change + description of transitional provisions + transitional provisions that may affect future periods + line-item and EPS adjustments + adjustment for earlier periods
A voluntary change requires reasons for the new policy. An Ind AS-driven change requires the transitional-provision details. Do not mix them up.
Change in accounting estimate: disclosures
Nature of the change + amount of the effect on the current period + amount of the effect on future periods (unless impracticable to estimate)
If the future effect is not disclosed because it is impracticable to estimate, you must state that fact.
Prior period error: disclosures
Nature of the error + correction for each line item per prior period presented + basic and diluted EPS correction + correction at the start of the earliest prior period presented
If restatement for a particular prior period is impracticable, disclose the circumstances and how and from when the error was corrected. Later statements need not repeat these disclosures.
Ind AS issued but not yet effective
That the Ind AS is not applied + known or reasonably estimable information on its possible impact + title + nature of the change + date required + date planned to apply + expected impact, or a statement that it is not known or not reasonably estimable
This applies when the entity has not applied a new Ind AS that has been issued but is not yet effective.
Ind AS 8 vs IAS 8
Same core requirements; references to IFRS and the IASB framework are replaced by Ind AS and the Indian framework
No significant carve-out in the core disclosure requirements. Verify specific differences against ICAI material.

How to solve Disclosures and Comparison with IAS 8 questions

Use this method for any question that asks what to disclose, or whether a disclosure is correct.

  1. 1Classify the item first: a policy change (voluntary or driven by an Ind AS), a change in estimate, or a prior period error. The disclosure list depends on this.
  2. 2Recall the treatment: retrospective for policy changes and errors, prospective for estimates. This tells you whether line-item and EPS adjustments are needed.
  3. 3List the disclosures in a fixed order: nature, reason (for a voluntary policy change), current-period effect, prior-period effects by line item, EPS, and the amount for periods before those presented.
  4. 4Compute the amounts the question gives you: restated profit, line items, EPS (restated profit ÷ weighted average shares) and opening balances.
  5. 5Check the practicability test. If the effect cannot be determined, write the impracticability disclosure instead of a number.
  6. 6Check whether the question involves an Ind AS issued but not yet effective. If so, add the fact, title, nature, dates and expected impact.
  7. 7Conclude in one line: state what must be disclosed and that later statements need not repeat it.

Quickest way: Nature-Reason-Numbers-Practicable checklist

When to use it: Use this for 5-mark theory questions and for MCQs asking which disclosure is required or missing.

  1. Write the label first: policy change, estimate change, error or new Ind AS not yet effective.
  2. Write 'Nature' for all four.
  3. Add 'Reason' only for a voluntary policy change.
  4. Add 'Line items and EPS, current and each prior period' for policy changes and errors. For estimates write 'Amount now and in future'.
  5. Add 'Opening position of the earliest period' for policy changes and errors.
  6. Close with the impracticability fallback and the 'no repeat' rule for later statements.

Common mistakes in Disclosures and Comparison with IAS 8

  • Asking for restated prior period figures when there is a change in estimate.

    Students link every 'change' to restatement.

    Fix: Estimates are prospective. Disclose the nature and amount of the change and its future effect, with no restatement.

  • Leaving out the EPS adjustment when disclosing a policy change or error.

    Students focus on balance sheet and profit line items.

    Fix: Add basic and diluted EPS to the list, where Ind AS 33 applies to the entity.

  • Giving 'reasons why the new policy is more relevant' for a change forced by a new Ind AS.

    Students merge the two policy-change lists.

    Fix: For a voluntary change give the reasons. For an Ind AS-driven change give the title, transitional provisions and whether the change follows them.

  • Showing made-up prior period amounts when restatement is impracticable.

    Students think a number is always better than a statement.

    Fix: Disclose the circumstances and how and from when the change or correction was applied.

  • Forgetting the disclosure for Ind AS issued but not yet effective.

    It looks like a presentation note rather than an accounting rule.

    Fix: State that the Ind AS is not applied, its title, nature, effective date, planned date and expected impact, or that the impact is not known or not reasonably estimable.

  • Claiming big carve-outs in Ind AS 8 versus IAS 8.

    Students over-generalise from standards that do have carve-outs.

    Fix: Say that the core requirements are aligned and the differences are mainly terminology and references. Check ICAI's list before writing more.

Worked examples

Example 1

Case: Meera Ltd changes voluntarily from FIFO to weighted average for inventory in 2026-27, and applies it retrospectively. Inventory under FIFO and weighted average: at 31 March 2025, ₹40,00,000 and ₹39,00,000; at 31 March 2026, ₹50,00,000 and ₹48,00,000. Ignore tax. The 2026-27 statements show 2025-26 as comparative. State the key disclosures and the figures for 2025-26.

Show the solution
  1. Classify: a voluntary change in accounting policy. It is applied retrospectively, so the disclosures follow the voluntary-change list.
  2. Nature: the cost formula for inventories changes from FIFO to weighted average.
  3. Reason: the company must explain why the new policy gives reliable and more relevant information.
  4. Inventory at 31 March 2026 is restated down by ₹50,00,000 − ₹48,00,000 = ₹2,00,000.
  5. Inventory at 31 March 2025 is restated down by ₹40,00,000 − ₹39,00,000 = ₹1,00,000. This is the adjustment to opening retained earnings at the start of the comparative period, which falls before the comparative period.
  6. Profit for 2025-26 changes by (−₹2,00,000 closing) + ₹1,00,000 (opening) = −₹1,00,000.
  7. Disclose each affected line item (inventories, cost of materials consumed or changes in inventories, profit) and the effect on basic and diluted EPS for 2025-26, plus the ₹1,00,000 opening adjustment.
  8. Later statements need not repeat these disclosures.

Answer: Disclose the nature of the change, the reasons the new policy is more relevant, the line-item and EPS effects for 2025-26 (inventory down ₹2,00,000, profit down ₹1,00,000) and the ₹1,00,000 reduction in opening retained earnings for the earliest period presented.

Example 2

Case: In 2026-27, Ravi Ltd finds that electricity expense of ₹3,00,000 for 2025-26 was omitted from the books. Reported 2025-26 profit was ₹20,00,000 and weighted average shares were 10,00,000. Ignore tax. The company also changes the useful life of a machine in 2026-27, which increases 2026-27 depreciation by ₹80,000. State the disclosures for each.

Show the solution
  1. Classify: the electricity omission is a prior period error, so it is restated retrospectively. The useful-life change is a change in estimate, so it is prospective.
  2. Error: disclose its nature, which is an omitted expense of 2025-26.
  3. Restated 2025-26 profit = ₹20,00,000 − ₹3,00,000 = ₹17,00,000.
  4. Reported EPS = ₹20,00,000 ÷ 10,00,000 = ₹2.00. Restated EPS = ₹17,00,000 ÷ 10,00,000 = ₹1.70. Disclose the correction of ₹0.30 per share for basic EPS and diluted EPS (the same figure here only if there are no dilutive securities).
  5. Line items corrected: other expenses up ₹3,00,000 and trade payables up ₹3,00,000. The correction at the start of the earliest prior period presented is nil, because the error arose in 2025-26.
  6. Estimate: disclose the nature of the change and the ₹80,000 effect on 2026-27 depreciation. Disclose the effect on future periods, or state that it is impracticable to estimate.
  7. No prior period figures are restated for the estimate.

Answer: Error: disclose its nature, the ₹3,00,000 correction to expenses and payables, restated profit ₹17,00,000, EPS from ₹2.00 to ₹1.70 and nil opening correction. Estimate: disclose the nature, the ₹80,000 current-year effect and the future effect, with no restatement.

Exam tips

  • In theory answers, list disclosures in a fixed order: nature, reason, line items, EPS, earlier periods, impracticability. Examiners tick each point.
  • In case-based MCQs, check first whether the item is a policy change, an estimate change or an error. Most wrong options apply the wrong treatment.
  • For comparison questions with IAS 8, write that the core requirements are aligned and the differences are mostly terminology. Do not invent carve-outs.
  • Link to Ind AS 1. A material retrospective restatement can require a balance sheet at the start of the preceding period.
  • If the question gives per-share data, compute restated EPS. It is an easy mark that students skip.

Practice questions from Ind AS 8 Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors

Disclosures and Comparison with IAS 8: frequently asked questions

What must be disclosed for a change in accounting policy under Ind AS 8?

Disclose the nature of the change, and for a voluntary change the reasons the new policy is more relevant. Disclose the adjustment for each affected line item and EPS for the current and each prior period presented, and the amount relating to earlier periods, to the extent practicable. If this is impracticable, disclose why.

Is any disclosure needed for a change in accounting estimate?

Yes. Disclose the nature and amount of the change that affects the current period, and the effect on future periods unless it is impracticable to estimate. If you do not disclose the future effect for that reason, state the fact.

What does Ind AS 8 require for standards issued but not yet effective?

The entity discloses that it has not applied the new Ind AS and gives known or reasonably estimable information on the possible impact of first application. This includes the title, nature of the change, the date required, the date it plans to apply and the expected impact, or a statement that the impact is not known or not reasonably estimable.

How does Ind AS 8 differ from IAS 8?

The core requirements are aligned. The differences are mainly terminology, since Ind AS and the Indian framework replace IFRS and the IASB framework. Check ICAI study material for any specific differences before the exam.