Skip to content

Financial Management and Strategic Management · Financing Decisions - Capital Structure

Capital Structure Theories for CA Intermediate FM

Updated 4 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Capital structure theories explain whether the mix of debt and equity changes firm value and overall cost of capital. The NI approach says more debt raises value. NOI says value is unchanged. The Traditional view says an optimal mix exists. Modigliani-Miller says the mix is irrelevant without taxes, and with taxes debt adds a tax shield.

Understand Capital Structure Theories

Capital structure is the mix of debt and equity a firm uses to finance its assets. The key question is simple: if the firm changes this mix, does its total value change? Does its overall cost of capital (Ko) change? Each theory answers differently because each assumes something different about how Ke (cost of equity) and Kd (cost of debt) behave when debt rises.

The Net Income (NI) approach assumes Kd and Ke stay constant as debt rises. Debt is cheaper than equity, so adding debt pulls Ko down and raises firm value. Value is the market value of equity plus debt. Equity value is the earnings available to equity holders divided by Ke. The logic: investors ignore the extra financial risk. So the firm should use as much debt as possible.

The Net Operating Income (NOI) approach says the opposite. Ko is constant, and the market values the firm by capitalising EBIT at Ko. Debt looks cheaper, but shareholders demand a higher Ke to compensate for the extra financial risk. The two effects cancel. Value stays the same at every debt level, so there is no optimal structure. Here, Kd is assumed constant and Ke is the figure you solve for.

The Traditional approach sits between the two. A moderate amount of debt lowers Ko because debt is cheaper and Ke rises only slightly. Beyond a point, Ke rises sharply and Kd also starts rising, so Ko climbs. Ko falls, reaches a minimum, then rises. The point of minimum Ko is the optimal capital structure, where firm value is highest.

Modigliani-Miller (MM) supports NOI under assumptions: perfect capital markets, no taxes, no transaction costs, and investors borrowing on the same terms as firms. Any gap in value between a levered and an unlevered firm is removed by arbitrage, so the values equalise. When corporate tax is introduced, interest is deductible. Debt creates a tax shield, so a levered firm is worth more than an unlevered one, by the present value of the tax saving.

Key rules to remember

Value of firm (NI approach)
V = S + D, where S = (EBIT − Interest) ÷ Ke
Ke and Kd are constant. S is market value of equity and D is market value of debt.
Overall cost of capital
Ko = EBIT ÷ V
Under NI, Ko falls as debt rises. Use this to show the effect of added debt.
Value of firm (NOI approach)
V = EBIT ÷ Ko, and S = V − D
Ko is constant. First find V, then S by subtraction.
Cost of equity (NOI approach)
Ke = (EBIT − Interest) ÷ S
Ke rises as debt rises. Interest = D × Kd.
MM without taxes: value
V(levered) = V(unlevered) = EBIT ÷ Ko
Capital structure does not affect value. Ko is the same at every debt level.
MM without taxes: cost of equity
Ke = Ko + (Ko − Kd) × (D ÷ S)
Ke rises linearly with the debt-equity ratio.
MM with taxes: value
V(levered) = V(unlevered) + (t × D)
t × D is the tax shield on permanent debt. t is the corporate tax rate.
MM with taxes: cost of equity
Ke(levered) = Ke(unlevered) + (Ke(unlevered) − Kd) × (1 − t) × (D ÷ S)
Kd is the pre-tax cost of debt here. Ke rises with leverage, but less than without tax.
MM with taxes: WACC
Ko(levered) = Ko(unlevered) × (1 − t × D ÷ V)
WACC falls as debt rises, so a firm gains by using more debt.

How to solve Capital Structure Theories questions

Most questions give EBIT, debt, interest rate and either Ke or Ko, then ask for value, Ke or Ko at different debt levels. Identify the theory first, because it tells you which figure is held constant.

  1. 1Read the question and note the theory named or implied. NI means Ke is given and constant. NOI means Ko is given and constant. MM means check whether tax is mentioned.
  2. 2List the data: EBIT, debt amount, Kd, tax rate and the given Ke or Ko.
  3. 3Calculate interest as Debt × Kd. Under NI, deduct it from EBIT to get earnings for equity.
  4. 4Find the value: under NI, S = earnings ÷ Ke, then V = S + D. Under NOI, V = EBIT ÷ Ko, then S = V − D.
  5. 5Find the missing rate: under NI, Ko = EBIT ÷ V. Under NOI, Ke = (EBIT − Interest) ÷ S.
  6. 6Repeat for each debt level in a small table so the trend is visible.
  7. 7For MM with tax, find the unlevered value first, then add t × D. Compare levered and unlevered values.
  8. 8Write a one or two line conclusion: where Ko is lowest or value is highest, and what the theory says about the best structure.

Quickest way: Constant-rate shortcut and MCQ elimination

When to use it: Use it for MCQs, and to set up a clean written answer when time is short.

  1. Decide which rate is held constant. NI: Ke and Kd. NOI: Ko and Kd. Everything else is solved from that.
  2. For NI, go in the order earnings, S, V, Ko. For NOI, go in the order V, S, Ke.
  3. In MCQs, eliminate options that move the wrong way. Under NI, V rises and Ko falls with debt. Under NOI, V and Ko stay the same while Ke rises. Under MM with tax, V rises by t × D.
  4. Check your answer with a quick test: S + D must equal V, and EBIT ÷ V must equal Ko.
  5. In the written answer, show a table with one column per debt level and rows for interest, earnings, S, V and Ko. Each row can earn step marks, and a final line of interpretation earns the conclusion mark.

Common mistakes in Capital Structure Theories

  • Using EBIT instead of EBIT less interest to value equity under the NI approach.

    Students remember that value comes from EBIT and apply it to equity.

    Fix: Equity holders get only what remains after interest. S = (EBIT − Interest) ÷ Ke. Use EBIT in full only for V under NOI or for Ko.

  • Mixing up what is constant under NI and NOI.

    Both names look alike and both use the same data.

    Fix: NI: Ke is given, so you compute S first. NOI: Ko is given, so you compute V first. Write the constant at the top of your answer.

  • Applying the tax shield formula t × D in MM without taxes, or forgetting it in MM with taxes.

    Students do not check whether the question mentions corporate tax.

    Fix: No tax means V is the same for levered and unlevered. With tax, V(levered) = V(unlevered) + t × D.

  • Saying the Traditional approach has no optimal structure.

    It is confused with NOI or MM without taxes.

    Fix: Traditional says Ko falls, reaches a minimum, then rises. The minimum is the optimal capital structure.

  • Using book value of debt or equity when market values are intended.

    Balance sheet figures are handy, so students use them.

    Fix: These theories use market values. In NI, S is computed from earnings and Ke, not taken from the balance sheet.

  • Writing only numbers with no conclusion.

    Students run out of time and stop after the calculations.

    Fix: Add one line on what the numbers show, for example that Ko falls and value rises with more debt, so more debt is preferred under NI.

Worked examples

Example 1

A firm has EBIT of ₹5,00,000. It uses 10% debt. Ke is 12.5% and is constant at all debt levels. Under the NI approach, find the value of the firm and Ko if debt is (a) ₹10,00,000 and (b) ₹20,00,000.

Show the solution
  1. NI approach: Ke and Kd are constant. So S = (EBIT − Interest) ÷ Ke and V = S + D.
  2. (a) Interest = 10% × ₹10,00,000 = ₹1,00,000. Earnings for equity = ₹5,00,000 − ₹1,00,000 = ₹4,00,000.
  3. S = ₹4,00,000 ÷ 0.125 = ₹32,00,000. V = ₹32,00,000 + ₹10,00,000 = ₹42,00,000.
  4. Ko = EBIT ÷ V = ₹5,00,000 ÷ ₹42,00,000 = 11.90%.
  5. (b) Interest = 10% × ₹20,00,000 = ₹2,00,000. Earnings for equity = ₹5,00,000 − ₹2,00,000 = ₹3,00,000.
  6. S = ₹3,00,000 ÷ 0.125 = ₹24,00,000. V = ₹24,00,000 + ₹20,00,000 = ₹44,00,000.
  7. Ko = ₹5,00,000 ÷ ₹44,00,000 = 11.36%.

Answer: With debt of ₹10,00,000: V = ₹42,00,000 and Ko = 11.90%. With debt of ₹20,00,000: V = ₹44,00,000 and Ko = 11.36%. Under NI, more debt raises value and lowers Ko.

Example 2

A firm has EBIT of ₹6,00,000 and Ko of 12%, which is constant. It can borrow at 10%. Under the NOI approach, find the value of the firm, the value of equity and Ke if debt is (a) ₹20,00,000 and (b) ₹30,00,000.

Show the solution
  1. NOI approach: Ko is constant, so V = EBIT ÷ Ko = ₹6,00,000 ÷ 0.12 = ₹50,00,000 at every debt level.
  2. (a) S = V − D = ₹50,00,000 − ₹20,00,000 = ₹30,00,000. Interest = 10% × ₹20,00,000 = ₹2,00,000.
  3. Ke = (₹6,00,000 − ₹2,00,000) ÷ ₹30,00,000 = 13.33%.
  4. (b) S = ₹50,00,000 − ₹30,00,000 = ₹20,00,000. Interest = 10% × ₹30,00,000 = ₹3,00,000.
  5. Ke = (₹6,00,000 − ₹3,00,000) ÷ ₹20,00,000 = 15%.

Answer: V is ₹50,00,000 in both cases. With debt of ₹20,00,000: S = ₹30,00,000 and Ke = 13.33%. With debt of ₹30,00,000: S = ₹20,00,000 and Ke = 15%. Ke rises with debt and offsets the cheaper debt, so value does not change and there is no optimal structure.

Exam tips

  • Questions often ask you to compute at two or three debt levels and then comment. Always draw a small table and write the conclusion.
  • In MCQs, first identify the theory from keywords: constant Ke means NI, constant Ko means NOI, tax shield means MM with taxes.
  • Theory questions in the written part often ask you to compare NI and NOI, or to explain the MM assumptions and arbitrage. Learn the assumptions as a short list.
  • Round Ko and Ke to two decimals and show the formula line before the numbers, as this earns step marks.
  • Do not skip the interpretation. Name the optimal structure or state that debt does not matter, as the theory requires.

Practice questions from Financing Decisions - Capital Structure

Capital Structure Theories in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Capital Structure Theories: frequently asked questions

What is the difference between the NI approach and the NOI approach?

Under NI, Ke and Kd are constant, so more debt lowers Ko and raises firm value. Under NOI, Ko is constant and Ke rises with debt, so value does not change. NI therefore favours maximum debt, while NOI says capital structure is irrelevant.

What does the Traditional approach say about optimal capital structure?

It says Ko first falls as cheaper debt is added, reaches a minimum, and then rises as Ke and Kd increase. The point of minimum Ko is the optimal capital structure, where firm value is maximum.

How does Modigliani-Miller change when taxes are introduced?

Without taxes, firm value is independent of the debt-equity mix. With corporate tax, interest is deductible, so debt creates a tax shield. The levered firm's value equals the unlevered value plus t × D, and the WACC falls as debt rises.

Why does arbitrage matter in the MM approach?

If a levered and an unlevered firm with the same EBIT had different values, investors could switch between them and earn a risk-free gain. This buying and selling pushes the values back to equality, which is why MM without taxes says value is the same.