Skip to content

CFA Level I Exam · Investors and Other Stakeholders

Corporate Governance and ESG Considerations for CFA Level I

Updated 7 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Corporate governance is the system of controls, incentives and oversight that guides how a company is run and protects the interests of its stakeholders. To solve questions, identify the stakeholder conflict, the governance weakness or strength, and its effect on risk, cost of capital and value. ESG factors add environmental, social and governance risks.

Understand Corporate Governance and ESG Considerations

A corporate issuer has many stakeholders: shareholders, creditors, managers, employees, customers, suppliers and regulators. Their interests often conflict. Managers may prefer pay and perks over profit. Controlling shareholders may favour themselves over minority shareholders. Shareholders may prefer risk, while creditors prefer safety.

Corporate governance is the set of rules, processes and structures that manage these conflicts. It includes the board of directors, board committees (audit, compensation, nomination), shareholder voting rights, transparency and disclosure, and the legal framework. A good system aligns managers with owners and protects minority holders.

The board is the main control. It should be independent from management, have relevant skills, and oversee strategy, risk and executive pay. Independent directors help limit conflicts of interest. Shareholders can also act. Shareholder activism means using shareholder rights and pressure to change a company's behaviour. Tools include proxy voting, shareholder resolutions, public campaigns, talks with the board and seeking board seats.

ESG factors are environmental (climate, resource use, pollution), social (labour practices, safety, community and customer relations) and governance (board quality, pay, ownership structure, audit quality). Analysts treat them as sources of risk and opportunity that can affect cash flows, cost of capital and reputation.

Good governance has benefits: lower agency costs, better decisions, more reliable reporting, easier access to capital, lower cost of capital, and often a higher valuation. Risks of weak governance include fraud, poor capital allocation, entrenched management, weak controls and loss of investor trust. Even good governance has costs, such as time, compliance spending and possible slower decisions. Over-engineered or box-ticking structures may not improve outcomes.

Key formulas to remember

Core logic of governance
Weak governance → higher agency costs and risk → higher required return → lower value
This is a general qualitative chain, not a numerical formula. Strong governance works in the reverse direction.
ESG components
ESG = Environmental + Social + Governance
Each is a factor that can affect risk and return. Governance is part of ESG, not separate from it.
Shareholder activism tools
Proxy voting, resolutions, engagement, public campaigns, board seat nominations
Activists act through shareholder rights, usually to change strategy, governance or capital allocation.

How to solve Corporate Governance and ESG Considerations questions

Use this approach for any governance or ESG question. Most are scenario based and test whether you can link a feature to a stakeholder effect.

  1. 1Identify the stakeholder groups in the stem and whose interests are at stake.
  2. 2Name the conflict: manager versus shareholder, majority versus minority, or shareholder versus creditor.
  3. 3Spot the governance feature: board independence, committees, voting rights, pay structure, disclosure or audit.
  4. 4Decide whether it strengthens or weakens oversight and who benefits.
  5. 5Link the effect to risk, agency costs, cost of capital or valuation.
  6. 6If ESG is mentioned, classify the issue as E, S or G.
  7. 7Pick the option that matches the effect, and eliminate options with reversed logic or absolute words.

Quickest way: Direction-of-effect check

When to use it: Use when time is short and options are mostly qualitative.

  1. Ask: does this feature increase or reduce oversight?
  2. More independent oversight means lower agency risk; entrenchment means higher.
  3. Check the beneficiary: owners as a whole, or insiders only.
  4. Remove any option that reverses the direction or claims governance removes all risk.
  5. Choose the remaining option and move on.

Common mistakes in Corporate Governance and ESG Considerations

  • Treating governance as separate from ESG

    The letters E, S and G are often discussed as three different topics.

    Fix: Remember that G is one of the three ESG factors. Board quality, pay and ownership structure are governance issues.

  • Assuming good governance removes all risk

    Students overread the benefits.

    Fix: Good governance reduces some risks, such as fraud and agency costs. It does not guarantee returns, and it has costs.

  • Confusing shareholder activism with hostile takeover

    Both involve outside pressure on management.

    Fix: Activists use shareholder rights to push for change while remaining shareholders. A takeover aims to gain control.

  • Assuming all board members are independent

    Students ignore the links between directors and management.

    Fix: Check for executives, former employees, family ties or business relationships. Independence needs distance from management.

  • Mixing up E, S and G issues

    Some topics overlap, such as workplace safety or supply chains.

    Fix: Workplace safety and labour practices are social. Emissions and resource use are environmental. Board and pay structure are governance.

Worked examples

Example 1

A company's CEO also chairs the board, and most directors are former executives of the company. Which is the most likely effect on stakeholders? A) Lower agency costs for minority shareholders. B) Weaker board oversight of management. C) Stronger protection for creditors.

Show the solution
  1. The CEO chairing the board concentrates power and reduces separation between management and oversight.
  2. Directors who are former executives are likely not independent of management.
  3. Both features weaken the board's ability to challenge management.
  4. Weaker oversight tends to raise agency costs, not reduce them, so A is wrong.
  5. Creditors are not better protected by weaker oversight, so C is wrong.

Answer: B) Weaker board oversight of management.

Example 2

An investment fund holds 6% of a listed company. It publicly proposes a shareholder resolution to change executive pay and campaigns for other holders to vote for it. This action is best described as: A) a hostile takeover. B) shareholder activism. C) a leveraged buyout.

Show the solution
  1. The fund remains a shareholder and uses its voting rights.
  2. It proposes a resolution and seeks support from other holders, which is a typical activist tool.
  3. It does not try to buy control of the company, so A is wrong.
  4. A leveraged buyout means acquiring the company using mostly borrowed money. The fund is not doing that, so C is wrong.

Answer: B) shareholder activism.

Exam tips

  • Questions are usually short scenarios. Find the governance feature first, then its effect.
  • Watch for options with absolute words such as always or eliminates. They are usually wrong.
  • Know the sources of conflict: managers, controlling shareholders, creditors and minority shareholders.
  • Classify ESG issues carefully as E, S or G before choosing.
  • With no penalty for wrong answers, never leave a question blank. Eliminate reversed-logic options first.

Practice questions from Investors and Other Stakeholders

Corporate Governance and ESG Considerations in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Corporate Governance and ESG Considerations: frequently asked questions

What is corporate governance in CFA Level I?

It is the system of rules, structures and processes that directs and controls a company and manages conflicts among stakeholders. It covers the board, committees, shareholder rights, disclosure and incentives.

What is shareholder activism?

It is the use of shareholder rights and influence to change a company's strategy, governance or behaviour. Tools include proxy voting, resolutions, direct engagement and public campaigns.

What are the benefits and risks of corporate governance?

Benefits include lower agency costs, better oversight, more reliable reporting and often easier access to capital. Weak governance raises risks of fraud, poor decisions and entrenched management, and even good governance carries compliance costs.

What are ESG factors for corporate issuers?

They are environmental, social and governance matters that can affect a company's risk, cash flows and reputation. Examples are climate exposure, labour practices and board quality.