Skip to content

Level III Core · Guidance for Standard VI: Conflicts of Interest

Conflicts with Stock Ownership and Cross-Departmental Conflicts in Standard VI(A)

Updated 8 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Standard VI(A) requires you to fully disclose conflicts that could impair independence or objectivity, such as owning stock you cover or banking and sales ties. Standard I(B) requires you to resist pressure from banking, sales or issuers. Avoid the conflict or disclose it clearly and prominently. Firewalls help manage it but do not replace disclosure.

Understand Conflicts with Stock Ownership and Cross-Departmental Conflicts

Standard VI(A) Disclosure of Conflicts says members and candidates must make full and fair disclosure of all matters that could reasonably be expected to impair their independence and objectivity or interfere with their duties to clients, prospective clients and their employer. Disclosure must be prominent, plain and communicated in a way that clients can understand.

Two situations come up often. The first is stock ownership. If you or your firm owns shares of a company you analyse or recommend, you may be tempted to favour that position. The conflict is not banned. You must disclose it. If your firm holds a material stake, or you personally own the stock, readers of your report need to know so they can judge your opinion for themselves.

The second is cross-departmental conflict. Research analysts, investment bankers and sales staff sit in one firm but have different incentives. Bankers want the issuer as a client and may pressure analysts for favourable ratings. Sales staff want ratings that help sell product. Standard I(B) Independence and Objectivity requires analysts to stay independent and not let this pressure shape their ratings, so the firm should separate the functions and limit these pressures. Standard VI(A) then requires disclosure of the banking or other relationships that remain.

The tools are disclosure, avoidance and management. Disclosure tells the reader about the conflict. Avoidance removes it, for example by not covering a company you hold or by dropping a rating pressure. Management uses controls: firewalls that separate departments, restricted lists that bar research or trading in certain names, and watch lists for monitoring. These controls support independence, but if a conflict remains that could reasonably impair objectivity, you still disclose it.

A related case is issuer-paid research. When a company pays for research on itself, the analyst must disclose the payment and its nature. Accepting a flat fee that does not depend on the conclusion is more defensible than compensation tied to a favourable rating. Always disclose, and keep your opinion independent.

Key rules to remember

Core rule of Standard VI(A)
Conflict that could reasonably impair independence or objectivity → full and fair disclosure (or avoid it)
Test is a reasonable expectation of impairment, not proof that you were actually biased.
Disclosure quality
Disclosure must be prominent, plain and understandable to the client
Burying it in fine print does not satisfy the Standard.
Stock ownership
Own or firm holds stock you cover → disclose the holding (and consider avoiding the conflict)
Applies to personal holdings and firm holdings that could affect your recommendation.
Cross-departmental conflict
Research independence + firewall + restricted/watch lists + disclosure of remaining conflicts
Controls manage the conflict. They do not remove the duty to disclose what remains.
Issuer-paid research
Issuer pays for research → disclose payment and its nature; keep the opinion independent
Fixed compensation not linked to the conclusion is safer than success-based pay.

How to solve Conflicts with Stock Ownership and Cross-Departmental Conflicts questions

Use this sequence for any VI(A) conflict scenario in an item set or essay.

  1. 1Identify the parties: client, employer, analyst, and the other department or issuer involved.
  2. 2Name the conflict precisely: personal or firm stock ownership, banking pressure, sales pressure, or issuer-paid research.
  3. 3Ask whether it could reasonably be expected to impair independence or objectivity or interfere with duties. If yes, VI(A) applies.
  4. 4Choose the response: avoid the conflict if possible, otherwise disclose it fully and prominently.
  5. 5Add management controls the firm should use: firewall, restricted list, watch list, separate compensation from banking revenue.
  6. 6Check whether disclosure goes to the right audience: clients and prospects for recommendations, the employer for personal holdings or outside interests.
  7. 7Match your wording to the command word: identify, determine, justify, or recommend, and give the Standard by name.

Quickest way: Conflict, Disclose, Control

When to use it: Use when time is short and a vignette describes a possible conflict in a firm or analyst's behaviour.

  1. Spot the conflict: who gains if the opinion is biased?
  2. Say it must be disclosed under VI(A).
  3. Add the control: firewall or restricted list if departments are involved.
  4. Check the answer choices: reject any that rely on a firewall alone, on disclosure to only one party, or on silence because the opinion is honest.

Common mistakes in Conflicts with Stock Ownership and Cross-Departmental Conflicts

  • Thinking owning the stock means you can never write about it

    Students confuse VI(A) with an outright prohibition.

    Fix: The Standard requires disclosure, and avoidance where the conflict cannot be managed. It does not ban coverage of every owned stock.

  • Believing a firewall removes the need to disclose

    Firewalls sound like a full solution.

    Fix: A firewall is a control. If a conflict could still reasonably impair objectivity, disclose it.

  • Assuming an honest opinion needs no disclosure

    Students focus on actual bias instead of the appearance and reasonable expectation.

    Fix: The test is whether impairment could reasonably be expected, not whether you were in fact biased.

  • Treating issuer-paid research as forbidden

    Payment by the subject company looks improper.

    Fix: It is allowed with disclosure of the payment and its nature. Avoid compensation tied to a favourable conclusion.

  • Disclosing in vague or hidden wording

    Candidates think any mention counts.

    Fix: Disclosure must be prominent, plain and understandable to the client.

  • Treating VI(A) as the only standard for pressure from banking, sales or issuers

    Candidates see a conflict and think only of disclosure. They also mix this up with II(A) on MNPI, because both involve firewalls.

    Fix: Pressure from banking, sales or issuers, including issuer-paid research, falls under Standard I(B) Independence and Objectivity. VI(A) then requires disclosure of the conflicts that remain. Cite both where relevant. Firewalls in II(A) Material Nonpublic Information control information flow, which is a different issue.

Worked examples

Example 1

An analyst at a brokerage covers a listed manufacturer. Her firm's investment bank is seeking to underwrite that manufacturer's next bond issue. A banker asks her to keep a Buy rating. The firm has a firewall. Under the Code and Standards, what should she do?

Show the solution
  1. Identify the conflict: banking relationship and pressure on research.
  2. Ask the test: could this reasonably impair her independence and objectivity? Yes, because the banker is pushing a rating.
  3. Apply Standard I(B) Independence and Objectivity: she must keep her opinion independent and not be swayed by the banker's request.
  4. Add controls: report the pressure through compliance and use the firewall.
  5. Apply Standard VI(A): disclose the firm's banking relationship in the research report if it remains.

Answer: Under I(B), she should maintain an independent rating and report the pressure to compliance, relying on the firewall as a control. Under VI(A), she should disclose the banking relationship in her report. The firewall alone is not enough.

Example 2

A portfolio manager personally owns shares in a company that his firm is about to add to client portfolios. His firm has no policy on this. Which action best complies with Standard VI(A)? A. Say nothing because the company is a sound investment. B. Disclose the holding to his employer and clients as appropriate and avoid letting it affect the decision. C. Sell the shares after the clients buy. D. Disclose only to the company's management.

Show the solution
  1. Identify the conflict: personal holding in a stock recommended to clients.
  2. Test: ownership could reasonably impair objectivity, so VI(A) applies.
  3. Reject A: soundness of the investment does not remove the duty to disclose.
  4. Reject C: personal trades should not precede or take priority over client trades, which is Standard VI(B) Priority of Transactions. Selling after clients buy also leaves the conflict undisclosed.
  5. Reject D: the company's management is not the party owed disclosure.
  6. Select B: disclose to those affected and keep the decision objective.

Answer: B. He should disclose the holding to his employer and clients as appropriate and keep the decision objective.

Exam tips

  • In a conflict vignette, the correct option usually combines disclosure with a practical control. Prefer that over silence or a control alone.
  • Wrong options often say a firewall makes disclosure unnecessary or that honest opinions need no disclosure. Eliminate them.
  • In essays, name the conflict, state the Standard, and give the action in one or two short lines each.
  • Check who must receive the disclosure: clients for recommendations, the employer for personal interests.
  • Watch for issuer-paid research. The answer is disclose the payment and its nature, not refuse the work.

Conflicts with Stock Ownership and Cross-Departmental Conflicts in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Conflicts with Stock Ownership and Cross-Departmental Conflicts: frequently asked questions

What is the difference between disclosing and avoiding a conflict under VI(A)?

Avoiding removes the conflict, for example by not covering a stock you own. Disclosing keeps the situation but tells affected parties so they can judge your objectivity. Use avoidance when the conflict cannot be managed and disclosure when it remains.

Does a firewall satisfy Standard VI(A)?

No, not by itself. A firewall separates departments and helps protect independence. If a conflict could still reasonably impair objectivity, you must also disclose it.

Can an analyst write issuer-paid research?

Yes, provided the payment and its nature are disclosed and the analyst stays independent. Compensation that depends on a favourable conclusion creates a stronger conflict and should be avoided.

Do I have to disclose stock I own personally?

If the holding could reasonably be expected to impair your independence or objectivity, you must disclose it. Disclosure usually goes to your employer and to clients or prospects affected by your recommendations.