Skip to content

Private Wealth Pathway · Investment Planning

Investment Policy Statement (IPS) for Individual Investors

Updated 8 October 2026 · Fact-checked

An investment policy statement (IPS) is a written document that records a client's objectives and constraints and the rules for managing the portfolio. To solve IPS questions, separate return and risk objectives, then list the constraints: liquidity, time horizon, tax, legal and regulatory, and unique circumstances. Link each point to the client facts.

Understand Investment Policy Statement (IPS)

An investment policy statement (IPS) is the written agreement between adviser and client. It states what the portfolio is for, how much risk is acceptable, and what limits apply. It guides every later decision, such as asset allocation and rebalancing, so the portfolio is not driven by market mood.

The IPS has two main parts. Objectives say what the client wants: a return objective and a risk objective. Constraints say what limits the portfolio: liquidity, time horizon, tax concerns, legal and regulatory factors, and unique circumstances. A common memory aid is RRTTLLU, but the exact label matters less than covering all items.

The risk objective combines ability to take risk and willingness to take risk. Ability is objective: wealth relative to needs, time horizon, income stability, and liabilities. Willingness is subjective: the client's attitude and tolerance for losses. When the two conflict, the lower one usually governs the overall risk tolerance. A client with high ability but low willingness is treated as below average risk tolerance.

The return objective can be stated as a required return (what is needed to meet goals), a desired return (what the client would like), or both. It can be absolute or relative, and pre-tax or after-tax. A good return objective is measurable and tied to the goal, for example a return needed to fund spending after inflation, fees and taxes.

The IPS also covers practical items: purpose and scope, governance and responsibilities, the benchmark, the review schedule, rebalancing policy and how the IPS is updated. It is a living document. Review it when the client's circumstances, goals or markets change materially, not only on a fixed date. A written IPS protects both sides and supports the adviser's duty to act in the client's interest.

Key rules to remember

Components of an IPS
Objectives (return, risk) + Constraints (liquidity, time horizon, taxes, legal and regulatory, unique circumstances)
Cover every item, even if you write that a constraint is minimal for this client.
Overall risk tolerance
Overall risk tolerance = lower of ability and willingness (when they conflict)
Ability is based on facts. Willingness is based on attitude. Say which one is limiting.
Nominal required return (exact)
Required nominal return = (1 + spending rate + fees/taxes rate) × (1 + inflation) − 1
The spending rate, fees and taxes make up the required real return. Compound it with inflation. Use this when the question wants a precise figure.
Nominal required return (quick approximation)
Required return ≈ spending rate + fees/taxes rate + inflation
Spending rate = spending need ÷ portfolio value. The additive version slightly understates the exact result, because it leaves out the cross-term (real return × inflation). Use it only for a quick estimate or when the question allows it.
Real return from nominal
Real return = (1 + nominal) ÷ (1 + inflation) − 1
Use when a question gives a nominal return and asks for the real one.

How to solve Investment Policy Statement (IPS) questions

Use the same sequence for any IPS question, whether it asks you to build, critique or update an IPS.

  1. 1Read the command word. Identify whether you must state, determine, justify, or recommend, and how many responses are asked.
  2. 2Underline client facts: age, income, wealth, goals, dependants, health, job security, tax status and stated attitudes.
  3. 3Return objective: turn goals into a number or measurable statement. Decide whether it is required or desired, and pre-tax or after-tax, real or nominal.
  4. 4Risk objective: assess ability using facts, then willingness using attitudes. State both and the overall conclusion.
  5. 5Constraints: go through liquidity, time horizon, taxes, legal and regulatory, and unique circumstances. Use specific facts from the case for each.
  6. 6Check consistency. The return target must be realistic for the stated risk level. If not, say what has to give: goals, spending, or risk.
  7. 7Write your answer in short, direct sentences with the client fact as the reason. Show any calculation clearly.

Quickest way: Fact, label, reason

When to use it: Use when time is short, especially in essay sets that ask you to identify or justify an IPS element.

  1. Pick the element asked for: return, ability, willingness, or one constraint.
  2. Quote the single client fact that drives it.
  3. Label the effect: higher or lower risk capacity, short or long horizon, high or low liquidity need.
  4. Write one clause of reason, then stop. Extra text earns no extra points.

Common mistakes in Investment Policy Statement (IPS)

  • Treating willingness and ability as the same thing.

    Both sound like 'risk tolerance', and cases often mix them in one paragraph.

    Fix: Sort each fact: finances and horizon go to ability, attitudes and past behaviour go to willingness. Then state the lower as the binding one.

  • Stating a return objective without a number or a measure.

    Candidates write 'growth with income' because it sounds correct.

    Fix: Convert the goal into a required return using spending, inflation and the portfolio value. Say whether it is real or nominal.

  • Listing constraints generically, with no client facts.

    Memorised lists are easy to recite.

    Fix: Tie each constraint to a case fact, such as an upcoming tuition payment for liquidity.

  • Mixing objectives and constraints.

    Time horizon and liquidity affect risk, so they get placed in the risk objective.

    Fix: Keep time horizon and liquidity under constraints. Mention them as reasons for ability, but list them separately.

  • Ignoring taxes and fees in the required return.

    The question gives a pre-tax figure and candidates stop there.

    Fix: Check whether the objective is after-tax. Adjust for taxes and costs where the case gives them.

  • Giving more responses than the question asks.

    Candidates hope extra points will cover a weak answer.

    Fix: Only the number of responses requested is evaluated, in the order given. Give exactly that many.

Worked examples

Example 1

A client has a portfolio of ₹2,00,00,000. She needs ₹10,00,000 a year in spending from the portfolio, expects inflation of 4%, and wants the portfolio to keep its real value. Management costs are ignored and there are no taxes. Calculate the required nominal return.

Show the solution
  1. Spending rate = ₹10,00,000 ÷ ₹2,00,00,000 = 5%. With no fees or taxes, this is the required real return.
  2. Additive approximation: 5% + 4% = 9%.
  3. Exact calculation: (1 + 0.05) × (1 + 0.04) − 1 = 1.092 − 1 = 9.2%.
  4. 9% is the additive approximation and 9.2% is the exact figure. The question asks for the required nominal return, so give 9.2%. If the question allows the approximation, 9% is acceptable.

Answer: The required nominal return is 9.2% a year (about 9% by the additive approximation).

Example 2

A 35-year-old doctor has stable income, no debt and a 30-year horizon. In meetings she says she panics at losses and sold her equities in the last downturn. Determine her ability, willingness and overall risk tolerance.

Show the solution
  1. Ability: stable income, no debt and a long horizon give high ability to take risk.
  2. Willingness: panic at losses and a past sale in a downturn show low willingness.
  3. Overall: when ability and willingness conflict, the lower one governs.
  4. Her overall risk tolerance is therefore below average, even though her capacity is high.

Answer: Ability is high, willingness is low, so overall risk tolerance is below average. The adviser should build the portfolio for lower risk and work on client education.

Exam tips

  • Match the command word. 'Determine' wants a conclusion, 'justify' wants the reason using a case fact.
  • Always state ability and willingness separately before the overall conclusion.
  • In calculations, show the number clearly. A correct number on its own earns full credit.
  • Check that your return objective is consistent with the risk you concluded. Examiners reward flagging a conflict.
  • In item sets, read the answer options against the constraint categories: liquidity, horizon, tax, legal, unique.

Investment Policy Statement (IPS) in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Investment Policy Statement (IPS): frequently asked questions

What are the main components of an investment policy statement?

An IPS has objectives and constraints. Objectives are return and risk. Constraints are liquidity, time horizon, taxes, legal and regulatory, and unique circumstances. It also covers governance, benchmark, rebalancing and review.

What is the difference between ability and willingness to take risk?

Ability is how much risk the client can afford, based on wealth, income, liabilities and horizon. Willingness is how much risk the client is comfortable with. If they conflict, the lower one usually governs.

Is the return objective required or desired?

It can be both. The required return is what the client must earn to meet goals. The desired return is what the client would like. Say which one you are giving, and check it is realistic for the risk.

How often should an IPS be reviewed?

Review it on a regular schedule and whenever the client's circumstances, goals or the market environment change materially. The IPS is a living document, not a one-time form.