CMA Final · Corporate and Economic Laws
The Competition Act, 2002: CMA Final Paper 13 Guide
The Competition Act, 2002 prevents practices that harm competition in Indian markets. It covers anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant position and regulation of combinations, enforced by the Competition Commission of India. To solve questions, identify the practice, apply the relevant section's conditions to the facts, and state the Commission's power or order.
What this chapter covers
This chapter is about how Indian law protects competition in markets. The Act deals with three core problems: agreements between enterprises that reduce competition (section 3), abuse of dominant position (section 4), and mergers or acquisitions that may harm competition (combinations). Around these sit the institutions: the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the Director General, and the appellate forum.
The chapter also covers reach and policy. Section 32 lets the Commission inquire into acts outside India if they have, or are likely to have, an appreciable adverse effect on competition in the relevant market in India. Section 49 deals with competition advocacy, where the Commission gives opinions on policy and promotes awareness.
In Paper 13 this chapter sits with the other economic and corporate laws. It links to company law through mergers, groups and share transactions, and to the other regulators you study. Questions are usually application based: you get a business scenario and must decide which provision applies and what the Commission can do.
Paper 13 opens with a compulsory Section A of 15 MCQs, one short case study with 4 MCQs followed by 11 independent MCQs, and this chapter lends itself well to both. Its provisions have clear conditions, defined terms and specific powers, so a student who knows the exact wording can score reliably. It also feeds descriptive questions where you apply section 4 or section 27 to a case. Since you need at least 40% in every paper, a well-prepared chapter like this gives steady, low-risk marks.
The Competition Act, 2002: topics in the order to study them
- 1Competition Act 2002: Overview, Extent and DefinitionsTerms such as enterprise, relevant market and dominant position are used in every later topic, so learn them first.
- 2Anti-Competitive AgreementsSection 3 is the first of the three core prohibitions and introduces appreciable adverse effect on competition.
- 3Abuse of Dominant PositionSection 4 builds on definitions and contrasts with agreements: one enterprise or group acting alone, not parties acting together.
- 4Regulation of Combinations (Mergers and Acquisitions)The third core area; it works on prior scrutiny of deals rather than punishing past conduct, so read it after the two prohibitions.
- 5Competition Commission of India and Director GeneralOnce you know the offences, learn who inquires, who investigates and what orders can be passed.
- 6Extra-Territorial Jurisdiction (Section 32)A short topic that extends the Commission's inquiry power to acts outside India, so it needs the earlier concepts.
- 7Competition Advocacy (Section 49)A short, separate role of the Commission: opinions on policy and awareness, not enforcement.
- 8Appeals, Appellate Tribunal and EnforcementFinish with what happens after an order: appeals, compliance and penalties, which ties the chapter together.
How to prepare The Competition Act, 2002
This chapter rewards exact wording and clean distinctions. Prepare it in layers: definitions, prohibitions, institutions, then practice.
- Read the definitions and write each one in your own words, especially dominant position, relevant market and group.
- For each core section, make a one-page note: what is prohibited, who is covered, the conditions, and the exceptions.
- Learn section 4(2) as a list of five abuses: unfair or discriminatory conditions or price (including predatory price), limiting production or technical development, denial of market access, supplementary obligations, and leveraging one market into another. Note that conditions or prices adopted to meet competition are not covered.
- Learn the orders under section 27: stop and not re-enter, penalty up to ten per cent of average turnover or income of the last three financial years, and for cartels up to three times profit or ten per cent of turnover for each year of continuance, whichever is higher. Remember turnover means global turnover. Also note section 28 on division of a dominant enterprise.
- Pair sections 32 and 49 in one revision sheet: section 32 is about reach beyond India, section 49 is about opinions within sixty days that are not binding.
- Practise MCQs and short case scenarios. For each, name the section, test each condition against the facts, then state the outcome.
- Revise by timeline: repeat definitions and numbers every few days, since small details decide MCQs.
Common mistakes in The Competition Act, 2002
Mixing up agreements (section 3) with abuse of dominant position (section 4).
Fix: Ask first: did several parties agree, or did one enterprise or group act using its strength? Then pick the section.
Treating every unfair price or condition as abuse.
Fix: Check whether the condition or price was adopted to meet competition. If so, it is outside that clause.
Applying the ten per cent penalty rule to cartels without the proviso.
Fix: For cartels, state the higher of three times profit or ten per cent of turnover, for each year of continuance.
Saying section 32 applies to any foreign act.
Fix: Always add that there must be an appreciable adverse effect, or likely effect, on competition in the relevant market in India.
Treating the Commission's opinion under section 49 as binding.
Fix: Remember that section 49(2) says the opinion does not bind the Central or State Government.
Writing section numbers or figures from memory without certainty.
Fix: Learn only the numbers you have checked against the current text, and describe other rules in plain words.
Last-day revision: The Competition Act, 2002
- Section 4(1): no enterprise or group shall abuse its dominant position.
- Dominant position means strength in the relevant market in India that lets an enterprise operate independently of competitive forces or affect competitors, consumers or the market in its favour.
- Predatory price means selling below cost, as determined by regulations, to reduce competition or eliminate competitors.
- Unfair or discriminatory conditions or prices adopted to meet competition are not abuse under section 4(2)(a).
- Section 27(b): penalty up to ten per cent of average turnover or income of the last three preceding financial years.
- Cartel proviso: up to three times profit or ten per cent of turnover for each year of continuance, whichever is higher.
- Turnover for section 27 means global turnover from all products and services.
- Section 27 orders can also be passed against other members of a group that contributed to the contravention.
- Section 28: the Commission may direct division of a dominant enterprise; an officer who loses office cannot claim compensation.
- Section 32: the Commission can inquire into acts outside India if they have, or are likely to have, an appreciable adverse effect on competition in the relevant market in India.
- Section 49: the Commission gives its opinion within sixty days of a reference; the opinion is not binding.
- Section 49(3): the Commission promotes advocacy, awareness and training on competition issues.
The Competition Act, 2002 practice questions
- After completing the process under Section 29, the Commission forms the opinion that a combination is likely to have an appreciable adverse …
- Under the competition advocacy provision of the Competition Act, 2002, the Central Government refers a draft policy to the Competition Commi…
- A company incorporated and operating only in Singapore enters into an agreement with another foreign firm outside India. The agreement is li…
- Under Section 29A, parties to a combination submit an offer of modification, and the Commission does not accept it. Which sequence of timeli…
- The Commission forms the opinion that a proposed combination is likely to have an appreciable adverse effect on competition and issues a sta…
- Under the Competition Act, 2002, a State Government formulating a policy on competition makes a reference to the Competition Commission of I…
- Regarding Section 29A of the Competition Act, 2002, which statement is correct about proposing modifications to a combination found likely t…
- Which statement about the territorial extent and commencement of the Competition Act, 2002 under Section 1, as given in the text, is correct…
The Competition Act, 2002 in other exams
The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.
The Competition Act, 2002: frequently asked questions
Is The Competition Act, 2002 important for CMA Final Paper 13?
Yes. It is a core law chapter and suits both the MCQs in Section A and application-based descriptive questions. Its provisions have clear conditions, which helps you score if you learn them accurately.
Which sections should I learn word for word?
Focus on sections 4, 27, 28, 32 and 49, since their wording is precise and often tested. Learn the lists, time limits and penalty limits exactly. For other topics, understanding the concept is usually enough.
What is the difference between section 32 and section 49?
Section 32 gives the Commission power to inquire into agreements, dominance or combinations outside India that adversely affect competition in India. Section 49 is about advocacy: giving non-binding opinions on policy and creating awareness. One is enforcement reach, the other is promotion of competition.
How should I answer a case-based question on this Act?
Identify the practice, name the section, and test each condition against the facts. Then state what the Commission can do, such as directing the enterprise to stop, imposing a penalty or passing other orders. End with a clear conclusion.