Skip to content

Corporate Financial Reporting · Intangible Assets (Ind AS 38)

Internally Generated Intangibles and Goodwill under Ind AS 38

Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked

Under Ind AS 38, you split an internal project into a research phase and a development phase. Research spending is expensed. Development spending is capitalised only from the date all six criteria are met. Internally generated goodwill, brands, mastheads, publishing titles and customer lists are never recognised as assets.

Understand Internally Generated Intangibles and Goodwill

Buying an intangible asset is easy to account for: you pay a price and record it. Building one yourself is harder. Day-to-day spending on staff and materials is hard to separate from the cost of running the business. So Ind AS 38 adds extra tests for internally generated intangibles.

The first step is to split the project into a research phase and a development phase. Research is about obtaining new knowledge, searching for alternatives, and evaluating and selecting options (for example, finding new materials, devices, processes or systems). At this stage you cannot show that a future benefit will arise, so the spending is an expense when incurred.

Development is the stage where the asset is being designed and built. Development spending is capitalised only if you can demonstrate all six criteria: technical feasibility of completing the asset; intention to complete it and use or sell it; ability to use or sell it; probable future economic benefits (a market exists, or it is useful internally); adequate resources (technical, financial and other) to complete it; and reliable measurement of the spending attributable to it. Capitalisation starts on the date all six are met. Spending before that date stays an expense and cannot be reinstated later.

If you cannot tell research from development, treat the whole project as research. That means the spending is expensed.

Some items are never recognised. Internally generated goodwill is not an identifiable resource (not separable, and not from contractual or legal rights) that you control and can measure reliably at cost. Internally generated brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists and similar items cannot be told apart from the cost of developing the business as a whole, so they are not recognised either. The gap between an entity's fair value and its net assets is not the cost of an intangible asset.

Key rules to remember

Research phase
Research expenditure → expense when incurred
Includes obtaining new knowledge and searching for, evaluating and selecting alternatives.
Development phase
Development expenditure → intangible asset only if all six criteria are met
Technical feasibility, intention, ability to use or sell, probable future benefits, adequate resources, reliable measurement.
Cost of internally generated asset
Cost = Σ expenditure incurred from the date the criteria are first met
Earlier expenditure already expensed cannot be reinstated.
Directly attributable costs
Materials and services + employee benefit costs + fees to register a legal right + amortisation of patents and licences used
Selling, general administrative overheads and similar costs are not directly attributable.
Phases not distinguishable
Cannot separate research from development → treat all as research
The whole project spending is expensed.
Never recognised
Internal goodwill, brands, mastheads, publishing titles, customer lists → not assets
Spending is expensed as incurred.

How to solve Internally Generated Intangibles and Goodwill questions

Use this order for any question on internally generated intangibles. It keeps the logic clean and the marks safe.

  1. 1Identify the item. If it is internal goodwill, a brand, masthead, publishing title, customer list or similar, expense everything and stop.
  2. 2Check whether the project can be split into research and development. If not, treat all spending as research.
  3. 3Expense all research-phase spending.
  4. 4Find the date on which all six development criteria were first met. Read the case for feasibility, intention, ability, market, resources and measurement.
  5. 5Expense development spending incurred before that date. Do not reinstate it later.
  6. 6From that date, capitalise only directly attributable costs: materials, services, employee costs, registration fees and amortisation of patents or licences used.
  7. 7Expense overheads that are not directly attributable, such as general administration and selling costs.
  8. 8Total the capitalised amount and the expensed amount. Check that they add up to total spending, then state the journal or disclosure effect.

Quickest way: Date-line and sort method

When to use it: Use it for numerical questions with a list of costs spread over several months.

  1. Draw a quick timeline and mark the date the six criteria were met.
  2. Tag everything before that date as expense.
  3. After the date, tick each cost as directly attributable or not.
  4. Capitalise the ticked items and expense the rest.
  5. Check: capitalised + expensed = total spending.

Common mistakes in Internally Generated Intangibles and Goodwill

  • Capitalising development spending incurred before the criteria were met.

    Students capitalise the whole development phase from its start.

    Fix: Capitalise only from the date all six criteria are first met. Earlier spending stays an expense and cannot be reinstated.

  • Capitalising research costs because the project later succeeded.

    Hindsight makes early costs look like part of the asset.

    Fix: Research spending is always an expense. Success later does not change this.

  • Recognising internally generated brands or customer lists after spending heavily on them.

    Students see money spent and assume an asset exists.

    Fix: Such items cannot be distinguished from the cost of developing the business as a whole, so they are never recognised.

  • Including general administration or selling overheads in the cost of the asset.

    Students treat all development-period costs as attributable.

    Fix: Include only directly attributable costs needed to create, produce and prepare the asset for its intended use.

  • Capitalising when the case does not show all six criteria, for example no evidence of funding.

    Students count only feasibility and market.

    Fix: Tick off all six against the facts. If one is missing or unproven, the spending stays an expense.

  • Capitalising a project when research and development cannot be separated.

    Students assume part of it must be development.

    Fix: If the phases cannot be distinguished, treat the whole project as research and expense it.

Worked examples

Example 1

Surya Industries Ltd develops a new manufacturing process. Spending: research from April to June, ₹25,00,000; development spending from July to September, ₹12,00,000, before the company could show all six criteria; on 1 October all six criteria were met. From 1 October to March it spent materials ₹30,00,000, employee costs ₹35,00,000, fees to register a patent ₹5,00,000 and general administration overheads ₹8,00,000. Determine the amount capitalised and the amount expensed.

Show the solution
  1. Research spending of ₹25,00,000 is an expense.
  2. Development spending of ₹12,00,000 was incurred before the criteria were met, so it is an expense and cannot be reinstated.
  3. From 1 October, directly attributable costs are materials ₹30,00,000, employee costs ₹35,00,000 and registration fees ₹5,00,000. Total ₹70,00,000 is capitalised.
  4. General administration overheads of ₹8,00,000 are not directly attributable, so they are an expense.
  5. Expensed total = 25,00,000 + 12,00,000 + 8,00,000 = ₹45,00,000.
  6. Check: 70,00,000 + 45,00,000 = ₹1,15,00,000, which equals total spending (25 + 12 + 30 + 35 + 5 + 8 = ₹115 lakh).

Answer: Capitalised as an intangible asset: ₹70,00,000. Expensed: ₹45,00,000.

Example 2

Bharat Media Ltd spent ₹18,00,000 on an internal software project where it cannot distinguish the research phase from the development phase. It also spent ₹6,00,000 on building an internally generated brand and ₹4,00,000 on compiling its own customer list. Explain the treatment and compute the amount expensed.

Show the solution
  1. Where research cannot be distinguished from development, the project is treated as if incurred only in the research phase. So ₹18,00,000 is an expense.
  2. Internally generated brands are not recognised as intangible assets. So ₹6,00,000 is an expense.
  3. Internally generated customer lists are likewise not recognised. So ₹4,00,000 is an expense.
  4. Total expensed = 18,00,000 + 6,00,000 + 4,00,000 = ₹28,00,000.
  5. No intangible asset is recognised for any of the three items.

Answer: All ₹28,00,000 is recognised as an expense when incurred; no intangible asset is recognised.

Exam tips

  • In case-based MCQs, look for the date or event when feasibility, funding and market were proven. That date decides what you capitalise.
  • Learn the six criteria as a checklist. Written answers often ask you to list them and apply them to facts.
  • In numerical questions, show the expensed and capitalised totals separately and tie them back to total spending.
  • For website development questions, remember that planning-stage costs are treated like research, while application, infrastructure and design costs may be capitalised if the criteria are met. Operating-stage costs are expensed.
  • Never say internal goodwill can be recognised after a good year or a strong valuation. State that it is never recognised as an asset.

Practice questions from Intangible Assets (Ind AS 38)

Internally Generated Intangibles and Goodwill in other exams

The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.

Internally Generated Intangibles and Goodwill: frequently asked questions

What is the difference between the research phase and the development phase under Ind AS 38?

Research is about obtaining new knowledge and searching for and selecting alternatives, so spending is expensed. Development is applying findings to design and build the asset. Development spending is capitalised only when all six criteria are met.

What are the six criteria for capitalising development cost?

You must show technical feasibility, intention to complete, ability to use or sell, probable future economic benefits, adequate resources to complete, and reliable measurement of the spending. If any one is missing, the spending is an expense.

Why is internally generated goodwill not recognised?

It is not an identifiable resource that is separable or arises from contractual or legal rights, and it cannot be measured reliably at cost. The gap between fair value of an entity and its net assets is not the cost of an intangible asset.

How is website development cost treated under Ind AS 38?

The Appendix on website costs, which is the Ind AS equivalent of SIC 32, treats a website as an internally generated intangible. Planning-stage costs are expensed. Application, infrastructure, design and content development costs are capitalised only if the criteria are met. Operating costs are expensed.

Can I capitalise development cost that I earlier expensed?

No. Ind AS 38 prohibits reinstating spending that was previously recognised as an expense. Capitalisation begins only from the date the criteria are first met.