Corporate Financial Reporting · Property, Plant and Equipment (Ind AS 16)
Ind AS 16 Subsequent Costs and Component Accounting
Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Subsequent costs under Ind AS 16 are tested against the recognition criteria when incurred. Day-to-day servicing goes to profit or loss. Replacement of parts and major inspections are capitalised if the criteria are met, and the carrying amount of the replaced part or old inspection is derecognised. Significant parts may be depreciated separately.
Understand Subsequent Costs and Component Accounting
After you buy or build an asset, you keep spending on it. Ind AS 16 asks one question for every such cost: does it meet the recognition criteria for property, plant and equipment (PPE)? The standard says you evaluate all PPE costs at the time they are incurred. This includes costs to add to, replace part of, or service an item.
Day-to-day servicing is not capitalised. These costs are mainly labour and consumables, and may include the cost of small parts. They are often called repairs and maintenance. You charge them to profit or loss as incurred.
Replacement of parts is different. Some parts need replacing at regular intervals, such as a furnace lining or aircraft seats. When you incur the cost of a replacement and the recognition criteria are met, you add it to the carrying amount of the asset. You then derecognise the carrying amount of the part that was replaced.
Major inspections work the same way. If regular major inspections for faults are a condition of continuing to operate the asset, the cost of each inspection is capitalised as a replacement when the criteria are met. Any remaining carrying amount of the previous inspection is derecognised. This applies even if the old inspection cost was never separately identified when the asset was bought. The estimated cost of a future similar inspection may be used to indicate what the old inspection component cost.
Component accounting follows from this. You may depreciate separately the parts of an item that do not have a cost significant in relation to the total cost. So the standard permits separate depreciation for insignificant parts too. Parts that are significant are depreciated separately as a matter of the depreciation requirements of the standard. That wider rule is not in the text supplied here, so learn it from your study material.
Key rules to remember
- Day-to-day servicing
- Labour + consumables + small parts → Profit or loss as incurred
- Not added to the carrying amount of PPE. Usually called repairs and maintenance.
- Replacement of a part
- Cost of replacement → add to carrying amount, if recognition criteria are met; carrying amount of replaced part → derecognise
- Derecognise whether or not the replaced part was depreciated separately.
- Carrying amount of replaced part when not known
- Estimated cost of replaced part ≈ cost of the replacement
- Use only if it is not practicable to determine the carrying amount. The replacement cost is an indication of the original cost; you then depreciate it to date to find the carrying amount.
- Major inspection
- New inspection cost → capitalise; remaining carrying amount of previous inspection → derecognise
- Applies even if the previous inspection was not identified when the asset was acquired.
- Loss on derecognition of replaced part
- Loss = Carrying amount of replaced part − any sale proceeds
- Recognise in profit or loss. Compute carrying amount as original cost less depreciation up to the replacement date.
How to solve Subsequent Costs and Component Accounting questions
Use this order for any question on costs incurred after the asset is in use.
- 1List each cost in the question and decide its nature: servicing, replacement of a part, major inspection, or an addition.
- 2Apply the recognition test. Servicing (labour, consumables, small parts) goes to profit or loss. Replacements and inspections that meet the criteria are capitalised.
- 3Find the carrying amount of the replaced part or old inspection. Use its original cost, or the replacement cost as an indication if the original is unknown. Deflate the figure to the original date if the question says to adjust for price changes.
- 4Depreciate that cost from the original date up to the date of replacement to get its carrying amount.
- 5Derecognise that carrying amount and show the loss in profit or loss, after deducting any scrap proceeds.
- 6Add the new cost to the asset or component, and depreciate it over its own useful life from the date it is available for use.
- 7Compute the year's depreciation on each component separately and total it. Then give the closing carrying amount.
Quickest way: Capitalise, derecognise, depreciate in three lines
When to use it: Use it for time-pressed numerical questions with one replacement or inspection.
- Line 1: new cost capitalised. Line 2: old carrying amount written off to profit or loss.
- Line 3: depreciation for the year, with the old part depreciated up to the replacement date and the new part from that date.
- Check that the asset balance moves by new cost minus old carrying amount only, and that nothing is both capitalised and expensed.
Common mistakes in Subsequent Costs and Component Accounting
Capitalising every repair because it benefits the asset
Students link any large spend to a future benefit.
Fix: Servicing costs, mainly labour and consumables, go to profit or loss. Capitalise only when the cost replaces a part or is a major inspection and the recognition criteria are met.
Adding the new part but not derecognising the old one
Students forget that the old part is still in the carrying amount.
Fix: Always remove the carrying amount of the replaced part. Otherwise the asset is overstated and depreciation is charged twice.
Derecognising the original cost instead of the carrying amount
Students ignore depreciation already charged on the part.
Fix: Derecognise cost less accumulated depreciation. The loss in profit or loss is the carrying amount, less any sale proceeds.
Saying derecognition applies only when the part was depreciated separately
Students confuse component accounting with the derecognition rule.
Fix: The standard says to derecognise the replaced part regardless of whether it was depreciated separately.
Leaving the old inspection cost in the asset when a new inspection is capitalised
Inspection is treated as a pure expense or as an addition only.
Fix: Treat each inspection as a component. Write off its remaining carrying amount when the next one is capitalised, even if it was never identified at purchase.
Worked examples
Example 1
A plant was acquired on 1 April 2022 at ₹50,00,000, of which a furnace lining cost ₹10,00,000 with a useful life of 5 years. The rest of the plant has a 10-year life. Both use straight-line depreciation with nil residual value. On 1 April 2025 the lining was replaced at a cost of ₹12,00,000 with a 5-year life. The old lining was scrapped for nil. Show the treatment and the depreciation for 2025-26.
Show the solution
- Old lining: depreciation is ₹10,00,000 ÷ 5 = ₹2,00,000 a year. For 3 years to 31 March 2025 it is ₹6,00,000.
- Carrying amount of old lining at 1 April 2025 = ₹10,00,000 − ₹6,00,000 = ₹4,00,000.
- Derecognise ₹4,00,000. With nil scrap proceeds, recognise a loss of ₹4,00,000 in profit or loss.
- Capitalise the new lining at ₹12,00,000, since the recognition criteria are met.
- Depreciation on new lining for 2025-26 = ₹12,00,000 ÷ 5 = ₹2,40,000.
- Remaining plant cost is ₹40,00,000, depreciated at ₹4,00,000 a year. Total depreciation for 2025-26 = ₹2,40,000 + ₹4,00,000 = ₹6,40,000.
Answer: Loss on derecognition ₹4,00,000; new lining capitalised at ₹12,00,000; depreciation for 2025-26 is ₹6,40,000.
Example 2
An aircraft owned by an Indian airline costs ₹90,00,00,000 on 1 April 2023. A major inspection, a condition of continuing to operate the aircraft, is due every 4 years. At purchase, the inspection element was estimated at ₹8,00,00,000 and not separately invoiced. The first major inspection is done on 1 April 2025 at ₹9,00,00,000 and the aircraft remains in use. Show the entries to capitalise and derecognise at 1 April 2025. Assume straight-line depreciation with the inspection element over 4 years and no residual value.
Show the solution
- The estimated inspection cost at purchase is ₹8,00,00,000. It is a reasonable indication of the old inspection component, using the estimated cost of a similar inspection.
- Depreciation for the 2 years to 31 March 2025 = ₹8,00,00,000 ÷ 4 × 2 = ₹4,00,00,000.
- Remaining carrying amount of the previous inspection = ₹8,00,00,000 − ₹4,00,00,000 = ₹4,00,00,000.
- Derecognise ₹4,00,00,000 and charge it to profit or loss, because the inspection was done earlier than the full 4-year cycle.
- Capitalise the new inspection cost of ₹9,00,00,000 as a replacement, since the recognition criteria are met.
- Depreciate ₹9,00,00,000 over the 4 years to the next inspection: ₹2,25,00,000 a year.
Answer: Derecognise ₹4,00,00,000 to profit or loss; capitalise ₹9,00,00,000; annual depreciation on the new inspection component is ₹2,25,00,000.
Exam tips
- In MCQs, first classify the cost: servicing goes to profit or loss, replacement or inspection goes to the asset. Many options differ only on this.
- Always show both entries: capitalise the new cost and derecognise the old carrying amount. Marks are split across them.
- If the question gives no cost for the replaced part, say you use the replacement cost as an indication of its original cost, as the standard allows only when it is not practicable to determine the carrying amount.
- Write one line justifying the treatment with the recognition criteria. Do not quote a paragraph number unless you are sure of it.
- Compute depreciation component by component and total it at the end.
Practice questions from Property, Plant and Equipment (Ind AS 16)
- Sri Venkat Textiles Ltd trial-runs a new machine before it is ready for intended use. The directly attributable cost of the machine, includi…
- Mahesh Engineering Ltd capitalised a press at ₹60,00,000 with directly attributable costs included. During commissioning, items produced wer…
- Which of the following items is property, plant and equipment under the Ind AS 16 definition?
- Which of the following items qualifies as property, plant and equipment under the Ind AS 16 definition?
- Ind AS 16 defines property, plant and equipment by reference to its use. Sutlej Textiles Ltd holds the following tangible items. Which item …
Subsequent Costs and Component Accounting in other exams
The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.
Subsequent Costs and Component Accounting: frequently asked questions
Can I capitalise the cost of repairs and maintenance under Ind AS 16?
No. Day-to-day servicing costs, mainly labour and consumables and sometimes small parts, are recognised in profit or loss as incurred. Only costs that replace a part or meet the major inspection rule can be capitalised, and only if the recognition criteria are met.
What happens to the old part when a part is replaced?
You derecognise its carrying amount, whether or not it was depreciated separately. If you cannot determine that carrying amount, you may use the cost of the replacement as an indication of the original cost of the replaced part.
How are major inspections treated?
The cost of each major inspection is capitalised as a replacement if the recognition criteria are met. Any remaining carrying amount of the previous inspection is derecognised. This applies even if the previous inspection was not identified when the asset was acquired.
Is component depreciation compulsory?
The text above says an entity may choose to depreciate separately parts that do not have a significant cost in relation to the total. For parts that are significant, separate depreciation is expected under the depreciation rules of the standard. Check your study material for that wider rule.