Direct Tax Laws and International Taxation · Different Aspects of Tax Planning
Tax Planning for Salaried Individuals and Other Assessees
Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked
Tax planning for salaried individuals means arranging salary, allowances and investments within the law to lower tax. The first decision is the regime. Compute tax under the new regime (Section 202 slabs) and under the optional regime with deductions. Compare both, pick the lower, then check the option conditions.
Understand Tax Planning for Salaried Individuals and Other Assessees
Tax planning is lawful arrangement of your affairs to reduce tax. It is different from tax evasion, which is illegal. For a salaried person, the room for planning is small but real: the regime you choose, the way pay is split, and the investments you make.
Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, Section 202 is the default (new) regime for individuals, HUFs, AOPs (other than co-operative societies), bodies of individuals and certain artificial juridical persons. Tax is charged on the slab table in Section 202(1) on the total income computed under Section 202(2), unless the person exercises the option under Section 202(4). The slabs for tax year 2026-27 are: up to ₹4,00,000 nil; then 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25% in steps of ₹4,00,000, and 30% above ₹24,00,000.
The price of the default regime is that many exemptions and deductions are not available. Section 202(2) says total income is computed without the listed exemptions and deductions, without set-off of house property loss against other heads, and without exemption for allowances or perquisites provided under any other law. Deductions under Chapter VIII are barred, except those under sections 124(1), 124(2), 125(2) and 146, which remain allowed. Do not read this as a general allowance: every other Chapter VIII deduction is barred. Schedule III items 12 and 13 are barred other than those as may be prescribed.
Where the person exercises the option under Section 202(4), Section 202(1) does not apply, so the Section 202(2) restrictions do not apply either. The slab rates and the deductions available on the optional route are not part of Section 202, so take them from the question.
So planning is a comparison. Which route is better depends on the tax computed under each, using the data given in the question. Do not assume either; compute both.
Employer-side rules also matter. Under Section 29(1)(b), an employer's contribution to a pension scheme referred to in section 124 is deductible to the employer up to 14% of salary (salary here includes dearness allowance if the terms of employment so provide, but excludes other allowances and perquisites). Under Section 392, the employer deducts tax on salary at the average rate on estimated income, and takes into account details the employee furnishes, such as income from other employers and house property loss. Good planning means giving these particulars on time so that TDS matches your real liability.
Key rules to remember
- Default regime slabs (Section 202(1))
- Up to ₹4,00,000: Nil | ₹4,00,001-8,00,000: 5% | ₹8,00,001-12,00,000: 10% | ₹12,00,001-16,00,000: 15% | ₹16,00,001-20,00,000: 20% | ₹20,00,001-24,00,000: 25% | Above ₹24,00,000: 30%
- Applies to individuals, HUFs, AOPs (not co-operative societies), BOIs and certain artificial juridical persons unless the option under Section 202(4) is exercised. Surcharge, cess and any rebate are separate; apply them only if the question gives them.
- Restrictions in the default regime (Section 202(2))
- Total income computed without the listed exemptions and deductions; Chapter VIII deductions are barred except those under sections 124(1), 124(2), 125(2) and 146, which remain allowed; no set-off of house property loss against other heads; no set-off of carried-forward loss or depreciation attributable to the barred deductions
- Also no exemption for allowances or perquisites provided under any other law. Every other Chapter VIII deduction is barred. Schedule III items 12 or 13 are barred other than those as may be prescribed. Section 202(3) deems such loss and depreciation to be fully given effect and not allowable later.
- Option timing for a person with business or profession income (Section 202(4)(a))
- Exercise on or before the due date under section 263(1); applies to later years; withdrawal allowed only once; after that, never eligible again unless business income ceases
- If business income ceases, the clause (b) option becomes available.
- Option timing for a person without business income (Section 202(4)(b))
- Exercise along with the return of income to be furnished under section 263(1) for the tax year concerned
- The section gives this timing only. Do not add rules for later years that the section does not state.
- Employer pension contribution limit (Section 29(1)(b))
- Deduction ≤ 14% × (basic salary + DA if terms so provide)
- Excludes all other allowances and perquisites.
- TDS on salary (Section 392(1))
- Tax deducted = average rate × salary payable, where average rate = tax on estimated income ÷ estimated income
- Rates are those for the tax year of payment.
How to solve Tax Planning for Salaried Individuals and Other Assessees questions
Use this method for any question asking you to advise an individual, HUF or other assessee on tax planning or regime choice.
- 1List all income heads and amounts. Note the person's status (individual, HUF, AOP) and whether there is business or profession income.
- 2Compute total income under the default regime of Section 202: no listed exemptions or deductions, no house property loss set-off.
- 3Compute total income under the optional route (after opting out under Section 202(4)) with the exemptions and deductions the question allows, using the slab rates and deduction data given in the question.
- 4Apply the slab rates to each total income, then add surcharge and cess only if the question provides them.
- 5Compare the two tax figures and recommend the lower one, stating the saving in rupees.
- 6Check the option conditions: timing, and the one-time withdrawal rule if there is business income.
- 7Suggest lawful restructuring: tax-efficient pay components, employer pension contribution, timing of TDS particulars under Section 392(4).
- 8Close with a clear recommendation and a line that the plan is tax planning, not avoidance or evasion.
Quickest way: Break-even regime check
When to use it: When the question gives a lot of deductions and asks only which regime is better.
- Compute tax under the default slabs on income without deductions.
- Compute taxable income under the optional route and tax on it, using the slabs and deductions the question supplies.
- Subtract. The regime with lower tax wins; state the difference.
- If the question mentions business income, add a one-line note on the Section 202(4)(a) switching restriction.
Common mistakes in Tax Planning for Salaried Individuals and Other Assessees
Claiming deductions and allowances while computing tax under the default regime.
Habit from the old pattern of computing income.
Fix: Re-read Section 202(2). Under the default regime the listed exemptions and deductions are not allowed. Chapter VIII deductions are barred except those under sections 124(1), 124(2), 125(2) and 146, which remain allowed. Do not treat other Chapter VIII deductions as allowed. Claim the barred items only after opting out.
Setting off house property loss against salary in the default regime.
Students remember set-off as a general rule.
Fix: Section 202(2)(b)(ii) bars set-off of house property loss with any other head under the default regime.
Saying a business assessee can switch regimes every year.
Confusing the rule with that for salaried persons.
Fix: For business or profession income, the option once exercised applies to later years and may be withdrawn only once; after that it is not available again unless business income ceases.
Applying the employer's 14% pension limit to total salary including all allowances.
Treating 'salary' loosely.
Fix: Use basic plus dearness allowance (if terms provide it) only. Other allowances and perquisites are excluded.
Recommending a regime without a rupee comparison.
Relying on a rule of thumb.
Fix: Always show both computations and the difference. A regime is better only because the numbers say so.
Treating evasion techniques such as hiding income as tax planning.
Blurring planning, avoidance and evasion.
Fix: Keep suggestions lawful and disclosed. Say that planning works within the law.
Worked examples
Example 1
Meera, a salaried individual in Pune, has taxable income of ₹14,00,000 under the default regime of Section 202 (no deductions). Compute tax on slab rates, ignoring surcharge, cess and any rebate.
Show the solution
- Up to ₹4,00,000: nil.
- ₹4,00,001 to ₹8,00,000: ₹4,00,000 × 5% = ₹20,000.
- ₹8,00,001 to ₹12,00,000: ₹4,00,000 × 10% = ₹40,000.
- ₹12,00,001 to ₹14,00,000: ₹2,00,000 × 15% = ₹30,000.
- Total = ₹20,000 + ₹40,000 + ₹30,000 = ₹90,000.
Answer: Tax on slab rates is ₹90,000.
Example 2
Rohan has income of ₹20,00,000 before a house property loss of ₹2,00,000 from a let-out flat. Under the default regime, Section 202(2)(b)(ii) bars set-off of this loss against other heads, so his total income stays ₹20,00,000. If the loss could be set off, total income would be ₹18,00,000. Using the Section 202(1) slab table on both figures only to measure what the bar on set-off costs him, compute the tax on each. Ignore surcharge, cess and rebate. This is not a comparison of regimes.
Show the solution
- Total income ₹20,00,000 (loss not set off): ₹4,00,000 × 5% = ₹20,000; ₹4,00,000 × 10% = ₹40,000; ₹4,00,000 × 15% = ₹60,000; ₹4,00,000 × 20% = ₹80,000. Total = ₹2,00,000.
- Total income ₹18,00,000 (loss set off): ₹20,000 + ₹40,000 + ₹60,000 = ₹1,20,000 up to ₹16,00,000; then ₹2,00,000 × 20% = ₹40,000. Total = ₹1,60,000.
- Difference = ₹2,00,000 - ₹1,60,000 = ₹40,000, which equals ₹2,00,000 × 20%, the slab rate at the top of his income.
- Lesson: the bar on loss set-off raises his taxable income by the amount of the loss. It is one cost of the default regime. It is not a measure of the saving from opting out, because opting out also changes the slab rates and the deductions available. In an exam, take the optional-route slabs and deductions from the question and compare the full tax on both routes.
Answer: Slab tax is ₹2,00,000 on ₹20,00,000 and ₹1,60,000 on ₹18,00,000. The ₹40,000 difference shows only the tax effect of the bar on set-off of the ₹2,00,000 loss. It is not the saving from opting out.
Exam tips
- Always show both regime computations side by side, then a one-line recommendation. Marks are given for the comparison.
- Quote Section 202(2) restrictions precisely: exemptions, deductions (with the Chapter VIII carve-out), house property loss set-off, loss and depreciation carry-forward.
- For business income, mention the Section 202(4)(a) switching limits; for a person without business income, mention that the option is exercised along with the return under section 263(1) for the tax year.
- Use the Income-tax Act, 2025 section numbers and 'tax year' wording, not the 1961 Act.
- In MCQs, check whether surcharge, cess or rebate is mentioned. If not, ignore them.
Practice questions from Different Aspects of Tax Planning
- A bank fails to furnish a statement it was required to file under section 508(1) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 within the specified time. Whic…
- Which of the following is a criterion that the Board or an authorised authority may have regard to while issuing jurisdiction directions und…
- Under section 241(5)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 2025, the Board empowers a specified authority to order that an Assessing Officer's powers in…
- A registered office of a bank, a prescribed reporting financial institution, was required to file a statement under section 508 of the Incom…
- Greenleaf Traders Ltd furnished a statement of specified financial transactions. The prescribed income-tax authority found a defect and inti…
Tax Planning for Salaried Individuals and Other Assessees: frequently asked questions
Which tax regime is better for a salaried person?
Neither is better in every case. Compute tax under the default Section 202 slabs and under the optional route, using the slabs and deductions given in the question, then choose the lower.
When does a salaried employee exercise the option to opt out of the default regime?
Under Section 202(4)(b), a person without business or profession income exercises the option along with the return of income under section 263(1) for the tax year concerned. The one-time withdrawal limit in Section 202(4)(a) applies to persons with business or profession income.
Does the employer deduct TDS under the regime I choose?
The employer deducts tax at the average rate on estimated salary income under Section 392(1). You should give your particulars, such as other income and house property loss, so that deduction matches your liability.
Is tax planning for HUFs the same as for individuals?
The default slab table in Section 202 covers HUFs as well as individuals, so the regime comparison works in the same way. Planning differs in the sources of income and the deductions the HUF can actually use.