FRM Exam Part II · Liquidity Risk
Liquidity Risk Regulation: LCR and NSFR Explained
Updated 11 October 2026 · Fact-checked
LCR and NSFR are Basel III liquidity standards. LCR = stock of HQLA ÷ total net cash outflows over 30 days, and must be at least 100%. NSFR = available stable funding ÷ required stable funding over one year, also at least 100%. To solve questions, weight each item by its factor, then divide.
Understand Liquidity Risk Regulation: LCR and NSFR
Banks fail from running out of cash, not only from losses. Basel III added two liquidity standards after the 2007-2009 crisis. They test two different time horizons.
The Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) is a short-term test. It asks: if a severe stress hits for 30 days, does the bank hold enough unencumbered high-quality liquid assets (HQLA) to cover net cash outflows? HQLA must be easy to sell at little loss, even in stress.
HQLA has levels. Level 1 assets are cash, central bank reserves and zero-risk-weight sovereign debt, with no haircut and no cap. Level 2A assets (for example some 20% risk-weight sovereign and covered bonds, high-rated corporate bonds) take a 15% haircut. Level 2B assets (for example lower-rated corporate bonds, some equities, RMBS) take larger haircuts. Level 2 in total cannot exceed 40% of HQLA, and Level 2B cannot exceed 15% of HQLA, after haircuts and adjustments.
Net cash outflows are stressed outflows minus stressed inflows over 30 days. Outflows come from run-off rates on liabilities: stable retail deposits run off at a low rate (a minimum of 3%), less stable retail at a higher rate (a minimum of 10%), and unsecured wholesale funding at higher rates. Inflows are capped at 75% of total outflows, so net outflows are never below 25% of gross outflows.
The Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) is a structural, one-year test. It asks whether long-term funding matches the liquidity profile of assets and off-balance-sheet items. Available stable funding (ASF) weights liabilities and capital by how stable they are: regulatory capital gets 100%, stable retail deposits 95% (90% for less stable), and short-term wholesale funding from financial institutions 0%. Required stable funding (RSF) weights assets by how hard they are to liquidate: cash 0%, Level 1 assets 5%, and loans with higher risk weights or long maturities get higher factors, up to 100%. In short, LCR is about surviving a month; NSFR is about not funding long assets with short money.
Key formulas to remember
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio
- LCR = Stock of HQLA ÷ Total net cash outflows over next 30 days ≥ 100%
- HQLA must be unencumbered and measured after haircuts and the Level 2 caps.
- Net cash outflows
- Net outflows = Total stressed outflows − min(Total stressed inflows, 75% × Total stressed outflows)
- Each outflow = balance × run-off rate. Each inflow = balance × inflow rate.
- HQLA composition limits
- Level 2 ≤ 40% of HQLA; Level 2B ≤ 15% of HQLA
- Level 1 has no cap. Level 2A haircut is 15%. Level 2B haircuts are larger.
- Net Stable Funding Ratio
- NSFR = Available stable funding (ASF) ÷ Required stable funding (RSF) ≥ 100%
- Horizon is one year. Both sides are weighted sums of balance sheet items.
- ASF and RSF weighting
- ASF = Σ (liability or capital × ASF factor); RSF = Σ (asset or off-balance-sheet item × RSF factor)
- High ASF factor means stable funding. High RSF factor means illiquid asset.
How to solve Liquidity Risk Regulation: LCR and NSFR questions
Use the same routine for any LCR or NSFR numerical or conceptual question.
- 1Identify the ratio asked: 30-day LCR or one-year NSFR. Note the 100% minimum.
- 2For LCR, list HQLA by level. Apply haircuts to Level 2A and 2B first.
- 3Check the caps: Level 2 at most 40% of HQLA and Level 2B at most 15%. Cut any excess.
- 4Multiply each liability by its run-off rate to get outflows. Multiply each inflow by its inflow rate.
- 5Cap inflows at 75% of outflows, then compute net outflows and divide HQLA by them.
- 6For NSFR, multiply each funding item by its ASF factor and each asset by its RSF factor. Sum both sides.
- 7Divide ASF by RSF. Compare with 100% and state the shortfall or surplus.
- 8Interpret: say what the result means for survival over 30 days (LCR) or for funding mismatch (NSFR).
Quickest way: Weight, sum, divide
When to use it: Use for numerical MCQs when the question gives factors and balances and time is short.
- Read the factors in the question. Do not rely on memory if they are given.
- Compute the numerator and denominator separately on paper.
- Check caps and the 75% inflow limit before dividing. These are the usual traps.
- Eliminate options that are on the wrong side of 100% or that ignore a cap.
- For concept questions, remember: LCR is 30 days and HQLA; NSFR is one year and stable funding.
Common mistakes in Liquidity Risk Regulation: LCR and NSFR
Counting all inflows against outflows in LCR.
Students think net means outflows minus inflows only.
Fix: Cap inflows at 75% of outflows. Net outflows are at least 25% of gross outflows.
Ignoring the 40% and 15% limits on Level 2 assets.
The haircuts feel like the only adjustment.
Fix: Test the caps after haircuts every time. Excess Level 2 assets do not count.
Applying haircuts to Level 1 assets.
Students apply the Level 2 haircut to all HQLA.
Fix: Level 1 is counted at market value with no haircut and no cap.
Mixing up ASF and RSF direction.
Both are weights, but they apply to opposite sides of the balance sheet.
Fix: ASF weights liabilities and capital. RSF weights assets. Put ASF on top.
Saying NSFR is a 30-day or stress measure.
Students blend the two ratios.
Fix: NSFR is a one-year structural ratio. LCR is the 30-day stress ratio.
Worked examples
Example 1
A bank holds Level 1 assets of $60 million and Level 2A assets of $30 million (before haircut). Level 2A takes a 15% haircut. Total stressed outflows are $90 million and stressed inflows are $50 million. Compute the LCR. Ignore Level 2B.
Show the solution
- Level 2A after haircut = 30 × 0.85 = $25.5 million.
- Check cap: Level 2 must be ≤ 40% of HQLA, which means Level 2 ≤ (2/3) × Level 1 = $40 million. 25.5 < 40, so no cut.
- HQLA = 60 + 25.5 = $85.5 million.
- Inflow cap = 75% × 90 = $67.5 million. Inflows of 50 are below the cap, so use 50.
- Net outflows = 90 − 50 = $40 million.
- LCR = 85.5 ÷ 40 = 213.75%.
Answer: LCR = 213.75%, well above the 100% minimum.
Example 2
A bank has ASF items: regulatory capital $20 billion (factor 100%), stable retail deposits $50 billion (95%), short-term wholesale funding from financial institutions $30 billion (0%). RSF items: cash $10 billion (0%), Level 1 securities $20 billion (5%), loans $60 billion (85%). Compute the NSFR.
Show the solution
- ASF = 20 × 1.00 + 50 × 0.95 + 30 × 0 = 20 + 47.5 + 0 = $67.5 billion.
- RSF = 10 × 0 + 20 × 0.05 + 60 × 0.85 = 0 + 1 + 51 = $52 billion.
- NSFR = 67.5 ÷ 52 = 1.298, or about 129.8%.
Answer: NSFR ≈ 129.8%, above 100%, so stable funding exceeds required stable funding.
Exam tips
- Know the numbers cold: 30 days, one year, 100% minimum, 75% inflow cap, 40% and 15% HQLA limits.
- In calculation questions, read whether Level 2 amounts are given before or after haircuts.
- For interpretation items, link a low NSFR to reliance on short-term wholesale funding for long-term assets.
- Expect questions on which assets are Level 1 versus Level 2 and on run-off rates ranking: stable retail below less stable retail below wholesale.
- Do not confuse the LCR with internal stress tests; LCR is a fixed regulatory scenario.
Practice questions from Liquidity Risk
- A trader holds a position in a bond quoted at a bid of 98.40 and an ask of 98.60. Using the mid-price as the reference, what is the proporti…
- A bank runs a reverse liquidity stress test. Which describes its objective most accurately?
- During a stress, a bank plans to raise cash by selling a bond portfolio with a market value of USD 500 million. The treasurer assumes a 10% …
- A treasurer notes that the bank's LCR is 120% but its NSFR is 92%. Which interpretation and response is most appropriate?
- A bank has USD 600 million of liquid assets. Over a 30-day stress, it expects: retail deposit outflows of 8% of USD 2,000 million; wholesale…
Liquidity Risk Regulation: LCR and NSFR in other exams
The same ground in other exams, if you are preparing for more than one or want another angle on it.
Liquidity Risk Regulation: LCR and NSFR: frequently asked questions
What is the difference between LCR and NSFR?
LCR tests short-term resilience: HQLA against net outflows over 30 days under stress. NSFR tests structural funding: stable funding against the liquidity of assets over one year. Both must be at least 100%.
What are the HQLA levels in the LCR?
Level 1 is cash, central bank reserves and zero-risk-weight sovereign debt, with no haircut. Level 2A has a 15% haircut. Level 2B has larger haircuts. Level 2 is capped at 40% of HQLA and Level 2B at 15%.
How do you calculate the NSFR?
Multiply each funding item by its ASF factor and sum. Multiply each asset and off-balance-sheet item by its RSF factor and sum. Divide ASF by RSF.
Why are inflows capped at 75% of outflows in the LCR?
The cap makes sure a bank always holds some HQLA and does not rely only on expected inflows during stress. It sets net outflows to at least 25% of gross outflows.