FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models
A bank backtests its 97.5% one-day ES model using a joint approach in which ES is treated as elicitable together with VaR. Which description of this result is most accurate?
The pair of VaR and ES at the same confidence level is jointly elicitable, so a single scoring function can evaluate both forecasts together. This allows comparative backtesting of ES through its link with VaR, without needing a normal distribution or a special confidence level.
- AThe pair (VaR, ES) is jointly elicitable, so a scoring function can evaluate both forecasts togetherCorrect
- BES becomes elicitable once the confidence level is raised above 99%
- CJoint elicitability applies only to VaR forecasts at two different confidence levels
- DThe pair is jointly elicitable only if losses are independent and identically normal
Explanation
Research shows that although ES alone is not elicitable, the pair (VaR, ES) at the same level is jointly elicitable. This gives a scoring function that can compare the two forecasts together. It does not depend on a particular confidence level or on normality.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models questions
- A bank backtests ES with a method that compares the realised average of losses beyond VaR to forecast ES, using a bootstrap or simulation un…
- A bank's 99% one-day VaR backtest over 500 days shows 5 exceptions, exactly the expected number. However, 4 of the 5 exceptions occurred in …
- A bank backtests its 99% VaR model using 500 daily PIT values. A histogram of the PIT values shows large excesses in the bins near 0 and nea…
- A validator applies the Berkowitz test to a VaR model. She transforms PIT values using the inverse standard normal CDF to get z_t. Under the…
- A risk team backtests two 99% VaR models using only the count of exceedances over 500 days. Both models record 5 exceedances, yet one model'…
- A bank backtests a 99% daily VaR over 250 days with 2.5 expected exceedances. It observes 3 exceedances, but all 3 occurred in consecutive d…