Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Digital Resilience and Financial Stability: The Quest for Policy Tools in the Financial Sector

A bank defines an impact tolerance for its payments service: the maximum tolerable disruption is 4 hours. A scenario test shows the service is restored after 6 hours. Which conclusion and response is most consistent with a digital resilience framework built on impact tolerances?

The test shows a breach of the 4-hour impact tolerance, so the bank should find the vulnerabilities and invest to restore the service within 4 hours. Loosening the tolerance to pass would defeat its purpose, and simulated scenarios are precisely how such gaps are meant to be discovered.

  1. ANo action is needed because impact tolerances apply only to capital ratios
  2. BThe result shows a breach of tolerance, so the bank should identify vulnerabilities and invest to bring recovery within 4 hoursCorrect
  3. CThe bank should raise its tolerance to 6 hours so the test passes
  4. DThe bank should treat the test as irrelevant because it was a simulation rather than an actual event

Explanation

An impact tolerance is a threshold the firm should be able to remain within in a severe but plausible scenario. Recovery in 6 hours exceeds the 4-hour limit, so the firm should remediate the weaknesses found. Raising the tolerance just to pass defeats the purpose, and scenario tests exist to reveal such gaps.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Digital Resilience and Financial Stability: The Quest for Policy Tools in the Financial Sector shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Digital Resilience and Financial Stability: The Quest for Policy Tools in the Financial Sector questions