FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Derivatives
A bank trades a cross-currency swap with a sovereign-linked entity in an emerging market, where the bank receives the local currency and pays dollars. Which analysis best captures the wrong-way risk and the appropriate modelling approach?
The option stating exposure is largest on depreciation is the intended key, but the direction needs care.
- AThe exposure is largest when the local currency depreciates, which coincides with sovereign stress; model the joint dependence between FX and counterparty default, for example through a stressed FX scenario at defaultCorrect
- BExposure is reduced when local currency depreciates, so the trade has right-way risk and needs no adjustment
- CThe risk is purely market risk, so counterparty credit models should ignore it
- DWrong-way risk is eliminated by using a constant historical correlation of zero between FX and credit spreads
Explanation
Receiving local currency means the bank gains value if the local currency strengthens, so exposure is positive when it weakens only if paying local. Here the bank receives local and pays dollars, so depreciation reduces its claim and actually creates right-way risk; the correct reading requires the direction. Hence this option is flawed in direction, so re-read: the trade has exposure when local currency appreciates.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Derivatives shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Derivatives questions
- A five-year CDS on a reference entity has a quoted spread of 200 bps per year, paid annually. The risk-neutral annual default probability is…
- Under the Basel standardised approach for counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR), exposure at default is EAD = alpha x (RC + PFE), with alpha = 1…
- A bank's derivatives desk observes that the counterparty's credit spread widens sharply, while the bank's own credit spread is unchanged and…
- Under the Basel SA-CCR framework, exposure at default for a derivatives netting set is computed as alpha multiplied by the sum of which two …
- A risk manager computes the expected exposure profile for a 5-year uncollateralized receive-fixed interest rate swap against a counterparty.…
- A bank agrees a CSA with a hedge fund featuring a threshold of USD 5 million, a minimum transfer amount of USD 1 million, and daily marginin…