Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Derivatives

A bank uses the Basel standardised CVA approach and a risk manager observes that a portfolio of long-dated swaps with a lower-rated counterparty attracts a much higher CVA charge than short-dated swaps with the same notional and an investment-grade counterparty. Which factors explain this difference?

The standardised CVA charge depends on exposure, effective maturity and a supervisory weight tied to counterparty rating. Long-dated trades with a lower-rated counterparty have a higher weight and longer maturity, so CVA is more sensitive to spread changes and the capital charge is much larger.

  1. AOnly the counterparty's rating, because maturity does not enter the charge
  2. BHigher supervisory risk weight for the lower rating and greater effective maturity, which increases the exposure-weighted sensitivity to spreadsCorrect
  3. CLower exposure at default due to longer maturity amortisation
  4. DReduced capital because longer maturities allow more time for collateral to be called

Explanation

The standardised CVA charge scales with EAD, effective maturity (duration-like factor) and a supervisory weight that rises as credit quality falls. Long-dated trades from a weaker counterparty raise all three drivers, so sensitivity to spread moves is larger. Maturity does enter the formula, so the rating-only option is wrong.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Derivatives shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Derivatives questions