FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Validating Bank Holding Companies' Value-at-Risk Models for Market Risk
A bank's 99% one-day VaR model is backtested over 250 trading days and produces 6 exceptions. Under the Basel traffic-light approach, the number expected at the 99% level and the zone for 6 exceptions are, respectively:
At 99% over 250 days, about 2.5 exceptions are expected. Six exceptions lies in the Basel yellow zone, which covers five to nine exceptions, so the model is scrutinized and a higher multiplier applies. Green is zero to four and red is ten or more.
- A2.5 exceptions expected; yellow zoneCorrect
- B2.5 exceptions expected; green zone
- C1 exception expected; red zone
- D5 exceptions expected; red zone
Explanation
Expected exceptions = 250 x 1% = 2.5. Basel zones for 250 days: green 0-4, yellow 5-9, red 10 or more. Six exceptions falls in the yellow zone, calling for scrutiny and a higher capital multiplier.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Validating Bank Holding Companies' Value-at-Risk Models for Market Risk shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Validating Bank Holding Companies' Value-at-Risk Models for Market Risk questions
- A bank's 99%, one-day VaR is 4.0 million. A stress test using a historical crisis scenario shows a one-day loss of 18.0 million. A risk mana…
- A bank's validation group finds that backtesting exceptions are clustered in a few consecutive weeks, although the total count of 4 over 250…
- A bank holding company's trading desk holds a portfolio whose 1-day 99% VaR is computed with a variance-covariance model assuming normally d…
- A bank's validation team runs a sensitivity analysis on its VaR model. A 99% one-day VaR is USD 10.0 million using a 250-day window. When th…
- A bank's 99% one-day VaR backtest over 500 days produces 10 exceptions. Using the Kupiec proportion-of-failures test with a 5% significance …
- A validator wants to complement backtesting because VaR says nothing about the size of losses beyond the threshold. Which additional validat…