Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Governance

A bank's board sets a risk appetite statement that annual operational losses should not exceed 5% of annual pre-provision net revenue. The bank has an early-warning trigger at 60% of that level and a hard limit at 100%. Pre-provision net revenue is expected to be USD 800 million. Operational losses year-to-date are USD 27 million. What is the appropriate conclusion?

The loss limit is 5% of USD 800 million, or USD 40 million, and the early-warning trigger is 60% of that, USD 24 million. Year-to-date losses of USD 27 million exceed the trigger but not the limit, so the breach must be escalated.

  1. AThe hard limit is USD 40 million and the trigger of USD 24 million has been breached, so escalation is neededCorrect
  2. BThe hard limit is USD 40 million and no trigger has been breached, so no action is needed
  3. CThe hard limit is USD 27 million and has just been reached
  4. DThe hard limit is USD 48 million and the trigger of USD 28.8 million has not yet been breached

Explanation

Limit = 5% x 800 = USD 40 million. Trigger = 60% x 40 = USD 24 million. Losses of USD 27 million exceed the trigger but are below the limit, so escalation is warranted. Option D wrongly uses 6% of revenue as the limit.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Governance shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Governance questions