Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Capital Attribution and Risk-Adjusted Performance Measurement

A bank's business units each have a stand-alone economic capital figure, but the sum of these figures exceeds the bank-wide economic capital computed for the whole portfolio. Which statement best describes the reason, and the purpose of capital attribution in this case?

The sum of stand-alone capital exceeds bank-wide capital because of diversification across imperfectly correlated units. Capital attribution allocates the lower bank-wide total back to units so that the allocated amounts add up exactly to total economic capital.

  1. ADiversification across units lowers total capital, so stand-alone capital must be allocated down to units using a method that sums to the bank-wide figureCorrect
  2. BStand-alone capital always understates risk, so the bank-wide figure must be scaled up to equal the sum
  3. CThe difference arises because units use different confidence levels, which attribution eliminates by raising total capital
  4. DThe difference is an accounting error that should be removed by ignoring correlations between units

Explanation

Imperfect correlation among units produces a diversification benefit, so the sum of stand-alone capital exceeds total capital. Attribution methods allocate the total so contributions add up to bank-wide capital. Scaling up the total or ignoring correlations would defeat that purpose.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Capital Attribution and Risk-Adjusted Performance Measurement shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Risk Capital Attribution and Risk-Adjusted Performance Measurement questions