FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Measurement and Assessment
A bank's LDA model gives a 99.9% annual aggregate loss quantile (VaR) of USD 180 million for a risk category, with an expected annual loss of USD 40 million. The bank's provisioning already covers expected losses. What is the unexpected-loss capital requirement implied by this model?
Capital for unexpected loss is the 99.9% quantile minus the expected loss already covered by provisions: USD 180 million less USD 40 million equals USD 140 million. Using the full quantile would double count expected losses, while adding them would be wrong in sign.
- AUSD 220 million
- BUSD 140 millionCorrect
- CUSD 40 million
- DUSD 180 million
Explanation
Unexpected loss capital = 99.9% VaR minus expected loss = 180 - 40 = USD 140 million, since expected losses are covered by provisions and pricing. USD 180 million ignores that offset, and USD 220 million adds EL instead of subtracting it.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Measurement and Assessment shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Risk Measurement and Assessment questions
- A bank wants to make its RCSA more reliable for a trading operations unit. Which design change most improves the objectivity of the assessme…
- A bank uses scenario analysis alongside its internal loss data to measure operational risk capital. Which is the principal reason scenario a…
- During a risk and control self-assessment, a manager lists these items as 'operational risks': (1) a new competitor cutting prices, (2) staf…
- A risk manager is running scenario analysis workshops to estimate the severity of a rare cyber-extortion event. Business experts tend to anc…
- A bank's LDA model has Poisson frequency with mean 20 losses per year. Severity has mean USD 100,000 and standard deviation USD 300,000. Mod…
- A bank's LDA model uses a Poisson frequency with mean 20 events per year and a severity distribution with mean USD 0.5 million. Because of l…