FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Risk Measurement and Assessment
A bank's loss distribution approach models annual loss frequency as Poisson with mean 20 events per year and severity with mean USD 50,000. Assuming independence of frequency and severity, what is the expected annual aggregate loss?
Expected annual aggregate loss equals expected frequency times expected severity, 20 times USD 50,000, which is USD 1,000,000. This holds when frequency and severity are independent. Using severity alone ignores how many events occur in a year.
- AUSD 50,000
- BUSD 400,000
- CUSD 1,000,000Correct
- DUSD 2,500
Explanation
Expected aggregate loss = E[N] x E[X] = 20 x 50,000 = USD 1,000,000. USD 50,000 ignores frequency, and USD 2,500 divides instead of multiplying. USD 400,000 has no valid basis (it is not a product of the given data).
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Risk Measurement and Assessment shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Risk Measurement and Assessment questions
- A bank's RCSA for payments rates a control as 'effective' based on its design documentation. Control testing later shows it was bypassed in …
- In a loss distribution approach (LDA) model for a single operational risk category, a risk analyst assumes that annual loss frequency follow…
- A bank's RCSA for its trade settlement unit shows that nearly every business owner rates control effectiveness as 'strong', yet internal los…
- A bank wants its risk identification process to capture emerging risks that have not yet produced losses, such as a new payments platform wi…
- A bank's scenario analysis workshop asks business experts for the frequency and severity of a cyber-extortion event. The first estimate give…
- A bank's LDA model for one risk category has an expected annual loss of USD 20 million and a 99.9% annual aggregate loss quantile of USD 260…