FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Derivatives
A bank's one-year expected positive exposure to a counterparty is USD 20 million. The counterparty's one-year default probability is 2%, and loss given default is 60%. Assuming exposure is independent of default, what is the expected credit loss, and how would wrong-way risk affect it?
Expected credit loss is USD 0.24 million (20 million times 2% times 60%). Wrong-way risk would increase it, because exposure tends to be larger precisely when the counterparty is more likely to default, so the independence assumption understates the loss.
- AUSD 0.24 million; wrong-way risk would increase itCorrect
- BUSD 0.40 million; wrong-way risk would decrease it
- CUSD 0.24 million; wrong-way risk would decrease it
- DUSD 0.12 million; wrong-way risk would increase it
Explanation
Expected loss = 20 x 0.02 x 0.60 = USD 0.24 million. Wrong-way risk means exposure tends to be high when the counterparty's default probability is high, so the true expected loss exceeds the independence estimate. USD 0.40 million omits LGD.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Derivatives shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Derivatives questions
- Under the Basel SA-CCR framework, exposure at default for a derivatives netting set is computed as alpha multiplied by the sum of which two …
- A risk manager computes the expected exposure profile for a 5-year uncollateralized receive-fixed interest rate swap against a counterparty.…
- A bank agrees a CSA with a hedge fund featuring a threshold of USD 5 million, a minimum transfer amount of USD 1 million, and daily marginin…
- A risk manager computes CVA assuming exposure and counterparty default are independent. Expected exposures at two dates are 10 at year 1 and…
- A bank computes unilateral CVA on a 3-year swap using annual buckets. Discounted expected positive exposures at years 1, 2 and 3 are USD 2.0…
- A bank has three trades with one counterparty under a legally enforceable close-out netting agreement, with no collateral. Mark-to-market va…