CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Organizational Forms, Corporate Issuer Features, and Ownership
A company's founder holds shares carrying 60% of the votes but only 20% of the economic ownership through a dual-class structure. The risk most likely heightened by this structure is that the:
The main risk is that minority shareholders have limited influence over decisions affecting their returns. The founder controls 60% of votes while owning only 20% of the economics, so can act with weak accountability and bear only a small share of the costs of poor decisions.
- Afounder can bear the full cost of failed projects
- Bminority shareholders may have limited influence over decisions that affect their returnsCorrect
- Ccompany cannot raise additional equity from public investors
Explanation
Control exceeding economic interest lets the founder decide matters while bearing only 20% of the cost or benefit, so minority holders have little influence and may be exploited. Option A is wrong because the founder bears only a minority of the costs. Dual-class companies can still raise public equity.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Organizational Forms, Corporate Issuer Features, and Ownership shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Organizational Forms, Corporate Issuer Features, and Ownership questions
- An analyst notes that a public corporation has widely dispersed shareholders and professional managers who own few shares. This situation is…
- Compared with a general partnership, a limited partnership most likely gives its limited partners:
- Compared with a privately held corporation, a publicly traded corporation is most likely to:
- A shareholder-manager conflict in which a company's executives use corporate funds to buy luxury perquisites that do not add value for the f…
- A highly leveraged firm's shareholders approve a plan to replace a low-risk project with a much riskier project that has the same expected v…
- Which feature is most likely an advantage of remaining a private corporation rather than going public?