Skip to content

CMA Final · Cost and Management Audit · Forensic Audit

A forensic auditor of a manufacturing firm runs a digit-frequency test on thousands of vendor invoice amounts and finds the first digit 9 appears far more often than expected, while 1 appears much less than expected. Which technique is being applied and what does the result suggest?

It is Benford's law analysis. Natural data show digit 1 leading about 30 percent of the time and 9 rarely, so a heavy excess of 9s signals possible manipulation or fabricated invoices that warrant detailed follow-up investigation.

  1. ABenford's law analysis; the data may be manipulated or fabricated and needs further examinationCorrect
  2. BRatio analysis; the firm has high liquidity
  3. CRegression analysis; costs are fixed in nature
  4. DStratified sampling; the population is homogeneous

Explanation

Benford's law predicts that in naturally occurring data, the leading digit 1 appears about 30% of the time and larger digits progressively less. A heavy skew toward 9 is an anomaly and flags possible fabricated or manipulated figures, though it is only an indicator needing follow-up. The other options describe different techniques that do not relate to leading-digit frequency.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Forensic Audit shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Forensic Audit questions