FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Parametric Approaches (II): Extreme Value
A GPD is fitted to exceedances of operational losses over a threshold, and the estimated shape parameter is ξ = 0.6. Which statement about the fitted tail is correct?
The mean is finite but the variance is infinite. A GPD has a finite k-th moment only when ξ is below 1/k, so ξ = 0.6 allows a mean (needs below 1) but not a variance (needs below 0.5). The tail is heavy and unbounded.
- AThe mean of the exceedances is finite, but their variance is infiniteCorrect
- BBoth the mean and the variance of the exceedances are finite
- CThe mean is infinite, but the variance is finite
- DThe distribution has a finite upper endpoint, so losses are bounded
Explanation
For a GPD, the k-th moment exists only if ξ < 1/k. With ξ = 0.6 the mean exists (0.6 < 1), but the variance does not (0.6 > 0.5). A finite upper endpoint requires ξ < 0, so it does not apply here. The mean being infinite would need ξ ≥ 1.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Parametric Approaches (II): Extreme Value shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Parametric Approaches (II): Extreme Value questions
- A risk analyst at a bank wants to model the joint behavior of extreme losses on an equity portfolio and a high-yield bond portfolio. She not…
- A risk analyst models losses above a high threshold u using the peaks-over-threshold (POT) approach. According to the Pickands-Balkema-de Ha…
- A risk analyst wants to estimate the probability that two equity indices will both suffer extreme losses in the same period. Which multivari…
- A risk analyst fits a generalized extreme value (GEV) distribution to the monthly maximum daily losses of a trading portfolio. The estimated…
- A risk analyst fits a GEV distribution to maximum weekly losses of an equity portfolio and estimates a shape (tail) parameter ξ of 0.30. Whi…
- When choosing the threshold u in a POT analysis, which statement best describes the central trade-off?