FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Using Futures for Hedging
A hedger estimates that the standard deviation of the change in spot price is 0.06 and the standard deviation of the change in futures price is 0.04, with a correlation of 0.80. Using the optimal hedge ratio, what is the percentage of the variance of the unhedged position that is eliminated by hedging (hedge effectiveness)?
Hedge effectiveness equals the squared correlation between spot and futures price changes. With a correlation of 0.80, the squared value is 0.64, so 64% of the variance is eliminated. Using 80% mistakes correlation for variance reduction, and 36% is the residual variance left.
- A80%
- B64%Correct
- C36%
- D92%
Explanation
Hedge effectiveness is the R-squared of the regression of spot changes on futures changes, equal to rho squared = 0.80^2 = 0.64. So 64% of variance is removed. The 80% option uses the correlation instead of its square; 36% is the remaining variance, not the amount eliminated.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Using Futures for Hedging shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Using Futures for Hedging questions
- Which statement about basis risk in a futures hedge is most accurate?
- A firm uses a stack-and-roll strategy with short-dated futures to hedge a long-dated fixed-price forward sale commitment, as in the Metallge…
- A portfolio manager holds a diversified equity portfolio worth $50 million with a beta of 1.2 relative to an index. The manager wants to red…
- On 1 March a company sells 50,000 barrels of crude oil it will deliver in June. It hedges by shorting June futures at USD 80.00 per barrel. …
- A refiner wants to hedge its exposure to jet fuel prices using heating oil futures. The standard deviation of monthly jet fuel price changes…
- An airline hedges its jet fuel purchases with futures and estimates the minimum variance hedge ratio by regressing monthly changes in jet fu…