CS Professional · Drafting, Pleadings and Appearances · Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013
A High Court passed a winding-up order against Kaveri Textiles Ltd in 2012, before the Companies Act, 2013 came into force. The company now wishes to challenge that order. Under Section 303, how is the pending right of appeal against that order to be treated?
The appeal goes to the authority that was competent to hear such appeals before the 2013 Act commenced. Section 303 preserves the old appellate forum for winding-up orders made by a Court immediately before commencement, so the new NCLAT does not take over those appeals.
- AThe appeal must be filed before the authority that was competent to hear such appeals before the Act commencedCorrect
- BThe appeal must now be filed before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal
- CThe appeal lapses because the winding-up order is not covered by the new Act
- DThe appeal must be filed before the Central Government
Explanation
Section 303 says an appeal against a winding-up order made by a Court immediately before commencement is to be filed before the authority competent to hear such appeals before commencement. The NCLAT option is wrong because the section preserves the old forum rather than moving it to the new Tribunal.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Applications, Petitions and Appeals under Companies Act, 2013 questions
- Sahyadri Textiles Ltd applies to the Tribunal for confirmation of a matter under a provision of the Companies Act, 2013 that is silent on co…
- Which fact pattern falls within the scope of Section 303?
- Kaveri Foods Pvt Ltd obtained an exemption from the Central Government under a provision of the Act, subject to a condition that it would fi…
- Bharat Metals Ltd received an NCLAT order on 10 January. Due to the illness of its authorised officer, which it can prove, it files its Supr…
- Kaveri Foods Ltd files a Supreme Court appeal 130 days after receiving an adverse NCLAT order. It shows that its officer was hospitalised th…
- Counsel for a creditor of Modi Steels Ltd argues that, because the Act has commenced, a pre-commencement winding-up order cannot be enforced…