Skip to content

CS Professional · Artificial Intelligence, Data Analytics and Cyber Security - Laws and Practice · Enterprise Resource Management

A listed company's ERP logs show that a finance manager changed vendor bank details and then released a payment to the new account, and the change log was later deleted by a database administrator. Which governance feature would best have preserved evidence for later investigation?

Tamper-resistant audit trails, with log deletion rights restricted and monitored, would have preserved the evidence. They record who changed vendor details and released payment, and even administrators cannot erase them. Display size, bandwidth or font settings do nothing for evidence integrity or accountability.

  1. ATamper-resistant audit trails with restricted log deletion rightsCorrect
  2. BLarger monitor displays for the finance team
  3. CFaster internet bandwidth
  4. DAutomatic font settings in reports

Explanation

Audit trails that record who changed what and when, and that cannot be altered or deleted even by administrators, preserve evidence and support accountability. The other options have no effect on evidence integrity. Such logs also help produce electronic records admissible as evidence under the Information Technology Act, 2000 and evidence law.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Enterprise Resource Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Enterprise Resource Management questions