FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Portfolio Performance Evaluation
A manager holds a portfolio with a beta of 1.0 to its benchmark but tracking error of 6%. The manager then reduces tracking error to 3% while leaving the expected active return unchanged. What is the effect on the information ratio?
The information ratio doubles. It equals expected active return divided by tracking error, so with active return fixed, cutting tracking error from 6% to 3% doubles the ratio, showing the same excess return is now earned with half the benchmark-relative risk.
- AIt halves
- BIt is unchanged
- CIt doublesCorrect
- DIt falls to zero
Explanation
Information ratio = active return / tracking error. Holding active return constant while halving the denominator doubles the ratio. Claiming it halves inverts the relationship. Unchanged would require active return to fall proportionally.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Portfolio Performance Evaluation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Portfolio Performance Evaluation questions
- A portfolio earned 10% with a beta of 0.8 against the market. The risk-free rate is 2% and the market return was 9%. What is the portfolio's…
- A manager reports an information ratio of 0.5 versus a benchmark. Tracking error is 4%. What is the manager's active return?
- A consultant uses rolling 36-month style analysis on a manager and finds the style weights shifting from 70% value / 30% growth to 30% value…
- A risk committee reviews a manager whose attribution shows consistently large positive selection effects but the manager's stated strategy i…
- Which statement best describes a limitation of single-period Brinson attribution when applied to a portfolio that trades frequently within t…
- A portfolio manager earns an annual return of 9.0% against a benchmark return of 7.5%. The standard deviation of the monthly-annualized acti…