Skip to content

CS Professional · Strategic Management and Corporate Finance · Competitive Positioning

A mid-sized Indian apparel firm tries to be the cheapest producer while also spending heavily on premium designer branding and boutique service. Its costs are above those of mass-market rivals and its prices are too low to reflect a premium image, so its returns are below the industry average. According to Porter, this firm is best described as:

The firm is stuck in the middle. It mixes lowest-cost pricing with expensive premium branding, so it has neither a cost advantage nor a differentiated premium image, and as Porter predicts, it earns below-average returns.

  1. AStuck in the middle, lacking a clear competitive advantageCorrect
  2. BPursuing a successful hybrid focus strategy
  3. CEnjoying first-mover advantage
  4. DExploiting economies of scope

Explanation

Porter argued that a firm failing to commit to cost leadership, differentiation or focus is stuck in the middle and usually earns below-average returns. Here the firm has high costs of a differentiator but prices of a cost leader, so it has no clear advantage. Hybrid focus is not a recognised success here as returns are poor, and the other terms are not supported by the facts.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Competitive Positioning shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Competitive Positioning questions