FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Machine Learning and Prediction
A neural network with many parameters achieves very low error on the training set but substantially higher error on a validation set. Which action is most appropriate to address this problem?
Apply regularization such as dropout or early stopping. Low training error with high validation error signals overfitting, and these techniques limit model complexity or halt training before noise is fitted. Adding layers or training longer would worsen it, and dropping validation data would conceal it.
- AApply regularization such as dropout or early stoppingCorrect
- BAdd more hidden layers and nodes
- CTrain for more epochs without monitoring validation error
- DRemove the validation set and rely on training error
Explanation
The pattern indicates overfitting: the model fits noise in the training data. Regularization techniques such as dropout, weight penalties, or early stopping reduce complexity or stop training when validation error begins to rise. Adding capacity or training longer would worsen overfitting, and removing validation data hides the problem.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Machine Learning and Prediction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Machine Learning and Prediction questions
- A PCA on six standardized predictors yields eigenvalues of 3.0, 1.5, 0.6, 0.45, 0.3 and 0.15. What is the smallest number of components need…
- An analyst runs PCA on three unstandardized variables whose variances are 100, 4 and 1, with small covariances between them. The analyst not…
- A single-output neural network uses squared-error loss L = 0.5(y - ŷ)², where ŷ = w·x with no activation and no bias. For one observation, x…
- Two variables are standardized and have a correlation of 0.60. What are the eigenvalues of their correlation matrix, and what proportion of …
- In training a deep neural network, what is the purpose of the backpropagation algorithm?
- A confusion matrix for a credit model on 1,000 borrowers shows: true positives 60, false positives 40, false negatives 20, true negatives 88…