FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Art of Term Structure Models: Volatility and Distribution
A normal model has short rate 3%, σ = 1.2% per year, and no drift. Using the normal distribution, what is the approximate probability that the rate is negative after 4 years? Use N(−1.25) ≈ 0.106 and N(−2.5) ≈ 0.006, N(−0.625) ≈ 0.266.
After four years the standard deviation is 1.2% times the square root of 4, or 2.4%. The 3% rate is 1.25 standard deviations above zero, so the probability of a negative rate is N(−1.25), about 10.6%.
- A10.6%Correct
- B0.6%
- C26.6%
- DZero, because rates cannot be negative in a normal model
Explanation
Standard deviation after 4 years = 1.2% × √4 = 2.4%. Rate 3% is 3/2.4 = 1.25 standard deviations above zero, so P(r<0) = N(−1.25) ≈ 10.6%. Using 4 × 1.2% = 4.8% as the horizon deviation gives 0.625 and 26.6%; ignoring the square-root scaling is the error.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Art of Term Structure Models: Volatility and Distribution shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Art of Term Structure Models: Volatility and Distribution questions
- A risk analyst compares a normal (Ho-Lee type) short-rate model with a Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (CIR) model. In the CIR model the instantaneous ra…
- In a lognormal short-rate model, dr = a r dt + σ r dw with σ = 20% (annual proportional volatility). The current short rate is 5.00%. What i…
- The Black-Karasinski model is commonly written d(ln r) = a(t)[ln θ(t) − ln r]dt + σ(t)dw. Which description is correct?
- In a Ho-Lee model with constant volatility σ = 1.20% per year, the short rate is currently 4.00%. Ignoring the drift's effect on dispersion,…
- In the Ho-Lee model, the short rate follows dr = λ(t)dt + σ dw with σ = 1.20% per year. A risk manager wants the standard deviation of the s…
- A desk calibrates the Hull-White model dr = k[θ(t) − r]dt + σ(t)dw. Compared with the Ho-Lee model with the same time-dependent drift, which…