FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Factor Theory
A portfolio has exposures of 0.8 to Factor A and 0.5 to Factor B. Factor premiums over the period were A: 4% and B: -2%. The portfolio's total return in excess of the risk-free rate was 3.0%. What was the portfolio's residual (alpha) return?
The residual return is 0.8%. Factor contributions are 0.8 times 4%, or 3.2%, plus 0.5 times negative 2%, or negative 1.0%, totalling 2.2%. Subtracting this from the 3.0% excess return leaves 0.8% unexplained by the factors.
- A0.8%Correct
- B0.2%
- C0.8% lower, at -0.8%
- D0.2% lower, at -0.2%
Explanation
Factor return = 0.8 x 4% + 0.5 x (-2%) = 3.2% - 1.0% = 2.2%. Residual = 3.0% - 2.2% = 0.8%. Ignoring the negative sign of B's premium gives 4.2% factor return and -1.2%, and subtracting the other way gives -0.8%.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Factor Theory shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Factor Theory questions
- A risk manager notes that a small-cap value fund has historically delivered returns beyond its market beta. The manager wants to explain thi…
- During a sharp market rebound after a prolonged crisis, a momentum strategy that was long prior winners and short prior losers suffers large…
- An asset owner replaces a market-cap-weighted equity mandate with a smart beta product that weights stocks by fundamentals such as book valu…
- A risk analyst at an asset manager is explaining why the market portfolio's return is not the only source of systematic risk premium. Under …
- In a Brinson-style or factor-based performance attribution, a manager's portfolio return exceeds the benchmark. Which finding would most cle…
- In a Brinson-style or factor-based attribution, a manager's active return is 2.0%. Factor tilts explain 1.4% of this, and the remainder is s…