FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Portfolio Performance Evaluation
A portfolio manager's benchmark has a 60% weight in equities and 40% in bonds. The actual portfolio holds 70% in equities and 30% in bonds. In a Brinson-style attribution, the difference between the portfolio's and benchmark's asset class weights, multiplied by the benchmark sector returns (relative to the total benchmark return), is best described as which effect?
This is the allocation effect. It captures the value added or lost by holding sector weights different from the benchmark, measured with benchmark sector returns. Selection effect instead reflects return differences within sectors, and interaction reflects the joint effect of both weight and return differences.
- AAllocation effectCorrect
- BSelection effect
- CInteraction effect
- DCurrency effect
Explanation
Allocation (asset allocation) effect measures the value added from over- or underweighting sectors relative to the benchmark, using (wp - wb) times the benchmark sector return less total benchmark return. Selection concerns return differences within sectors at benchmark weights. Interaction combines weight and return differences together.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Portfolio Performance Evaluation shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Portfolio Performance Evaluation questions
- An analyst runs a returns-based style analysis for a fund using 36 months of data. Results show unstable weights: the small-cap weight swing…
- A portfolio earned 14% in a year. Its beta was 1.5, the risk-free rate was 2%, and the market return was 10%. What is the Treynor ratio?
- Which is a recognized limitation of returns-based style analysis compared with holdings-based style analysis?
- An analyst reports a manager's alpha of 2% per year with a standard error of 1.5% from 60 monthly observations. Which conclusion is most app…
- A portfolio manager earns an active return of 2.4% per year over her benchmark, and the annualized standard deviation of her active returns …
- A manager's rolling 36-month style analysis shows the weight in small-cap growth rising from 10% to 45% over three years, while the fund's s…