FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Regression with Multiple Explanatory Variables
A regression with k = 4 explanatory variables is estimated on n = 41 observations and produces an R-squared of 0.60. What is the adjusted R-squared?
Adjusted R-squared equals 1 minus (1 - R-squared) times (n - 1) divided by (n - k - 1). With R-squared 0.60, n = 41 and k = 4, this is about 0.556, so the closest option is 0.550. Adjusted R-squared is below R-squared.
- A0.600
- B0.550Correct
- C0.500
- D0.575
Explanation
Adjusted R² = 1 - (1 - R²)(n - 1)/(n - k - 1) = 1 - 0.40 × 40/36 = 1 - 0.4444 = 0.5556, which is approximately 0.556. Hmm, the closest listed value is 0.550. Check: 0.40 × 40/36 = 0.4444, so the adjusted value is 0.5556, closest to 0.550. Using n - k instead of n - k - 1 gives 1 - 0.4 × 40/37 = 0.5676, near 0.575, which is the wrong denominator.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Regression with Multiple Explanatory Variables shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Regression with Multiple Explanatory Variables questions
- The true model is Y = 1.0 + 2.0·X1 + 3.0·X2 + e. An analyst omits X2 and regresses Y on X1 only. In the sample, the regression of X2 on X1 g…
- A regression of Y on X1 and X2 with 30 observations gives a total sum of squares of 500 and a residual sum of squares of 140. What is the ad…
- A model of portfolio returns omits a relevant variable X2 that is positively correlated with the included variable X1, and X2 has a positive…
- A regression of portfolio return on market excess return uses a dummy D (1 after a regulatory change, 0 before) and an interaction D*Mkt: R …
- In a multiple regression, a researcher finds that two explanatory variables have a sample correlation of 0.98, the overall F-test is highly …
- An analyst regresses monthly fund returns on the market excess return and a dummy variable D equal to 1 for months in a recession and 0 othe…