FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Financial Correlation Modeling - Bottom-Up Approaches
A risk analyst at a bank compares two approaches to modeling joint defaults of a portfolio of corporate borrowers. In the first approach, the analyst specifies each borrower's individual default probability and then links them with a correlation structure. In the second approach, the analyst models the loss distribution of the whole portfolio directly. Which statement correctly describes the first approach?
The first approach is bottom-up. It builds portfolio default behavior from each borrower's own default probability and a correlation or dependence structure, whereas top-down models model aggregate portfolio losses directly without specifying individual entities.
- AIt is a top-down approach because it starts from portfolio-level loss data
- BIt is a bottom-up approach because it builds portfolio default behavior from individual entity default probabilities and their dependenceCorrect
- CIt is a top-down approach because it ignores individual default probabilities
- DIt is a bottom-up approach only if all borrowers have identical default probabilities
Explanation
Bottom-up models start with individual entity default probabilities and combine them using a dependence structure, such as a copula, to obtain the portfolio loss distribution. Top-down models work directly with aggregate portfolio losses. Identical default probabilities are not required.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Financial Correlation Modeling - Bottom-Up Approaches shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Financial Correlation Modeling - Bottom-Up Approaches questions
- A bank hedges a mezzanine CDO tranche by delta-hedging with index credit default swaps. After a market-wide spread widening, base correlatio…
- A risk team compares the empirical behavior of default correlation and equity correlation. Which statement is consistent with the evidence d…
- Two firms, A and B, each have a one-year default probability of 10%. The joint one-year default probability of both firms is 4%. What is the…
- A risk analyst at a bank wants to model the joint distribution of default times for two obligors. She has each obligor's marginal default-ti…
- A trader holds a long equity tranche and a short mezzanine tranche on the same CDO index to hedge. Which description best characterizes the …
- Two firms, A and B, each have a one-year default probability of 10%. The one-year joint default probability is 3%. What is the one-year defa…