FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models
A risk analyst evaluates a bank's daily VaR model using the probability integral transform (PIT). For each day, the analyst computes the model's predicted cumulative distribution function evaluated at the realized P&L. If the model's predicted distributions are correct, which statement describes the resulting PIT series?
With a correct model, PIT values are independent and identically distributed uniform(0,1) variables. Each is the predicted CDF evaluated at the realized P&L, so every quantile is hit with the right frequency. Normality only appears after an additional inverse-normal transformation.
- AThe values are independent and identically distributed uniform(0,1) random variablesCorrect
- BThe values are independent standard normal random variables with mean zero
- CThe values are all below the VaR confidence level, such as 0.01
- DThe values are positively autocorrelated with mean 0.5
Explanation
Under a correctly specified model, applying the predicted CDF to the realized outcome gives a uniform(0,1) variable each day, and independence holds when the forecasts use all available information. Normal values arise only after a further inverse-normal transformation. Values below 0.01 would occur only about 1% of the time.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Beyond Exceedance-Based Backtesting of Value-at-Risk Models questions
- An analyst transforms PIT values u_t into z_t = Φ^-1(u_t) and wants to test the joint hypothesis of correct distribution and independence us…
- A bank's 250 daily PIT values are transformed to z_t = Φ^-1(u_t). The sample mean of z_t is 0, the sample standard deviation is 1.40, and th…
- A risk analyst notes that Value-at-Risk (VaR) can be backtested directly by counting exceedances, but Expected Shortfall (ES) cannot be back…
- Why is backtesting ES generally considered more demanding in data terms than backtesting VaR at the same confidence level?
- A risk manager backtests a 99% one-day VaR model over 250 trading days and finds 2 exceedances, a result that passes the standard traffic-li…
- Two models A and B are compared over 250 days using average quantile scores at 99%. Model A averages 0.052 and Model B averages 0.047. The d…