FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · High-level Summary of Basel III Reforms
A risk analyst explains why the revised CVA framework captures more than counterparty default risk. Which description of CVA risk is most accurate?
CVA risk is the risk of mark-to-market losses on the CVA adjustment caused by changes in counterparty credit spreads and in the market factors driving exposure, not only actual default. Default losses are captured separately by counterparty credit risk capital requirements.
- AThe risk of losses from changes in counterparty credit spreads and exposure drivers that move the fair value of CVA, beyond actual defaultsCorrect
- BThe risk that a counterparty defaults and the loss given default exceeds collateral
- CThe risk that the bank's own funding costs rise because of a rating downgrade
- DThe risk of settlement failure on the delivery date of a derivative
Explanation
CVA risk is the mark-to-market volatility of the CVA valuation adjustment, driven by counterparty credit spreads and market risk factors affecting exposure. Default loss is covered by the counterparty credit risk (default) capital charge. Funding costs and settlement failure are separate risks.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on High-level Summary of Basel III Reforms shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More High-level Summary of Basel III Reforms questions
- A G-SIB leverage ratio buffer breach has occurred in a bank with Tier 1 capital meeting the 3% minimum but not the 3.5% total requirement. W…
- A risk officer is briefing the board on the Basel III reforms finalised in December 2017. Which statement best describes the purpose of the …
- Under the Basel III post-crisis reforms, a bank's leverage ratio is calculated as Tier 1 capital divided by which measure?
- A risk officer is explaining why the revised Basel III CVA framework was changed from the Basel II.5 approach. Which of the following was a …
- A bank's internally modelled total RWA is 600 and its RWA calculated under standardised approaches is 1,000. Assume the output floor is full…
- Under the revised SA-CR, how are exposures to unrated corporates generally treated compared with the pre-reform standardised approach?