FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview
A risk analyst scales a one-day 99% normal VaR of USD 3 million to a 10-day horizon, assuming iid zero-mean normal returns. Which result is correct, and why?
The 10-day VaR is about USD 9.49 million. For iid zero-mean normal returns, the standard deviation grows with the square root of time, so the one-day VaR of 3 million is multiplied by the square root of 10.
- AUSD 30.0 million, because VaR scales linearly with days
- BUSD 9.49 million, because VaR scales with the square root of timeCorrect
- CUSD 6.00 million, because VaR scales with the square root of the confidence level
- DUSD 3.00 million, because zero-mean returns do not accumulate
Explanation
With iid normal zero-mean returns, volatility scales with the square root of time, so VaR = 3 x sqrt(10) = 9.49 million. Linear scaling ignores diversification across days. The other options have no basis in the model.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Estimating Market Risk Measures: An Introduction and Overview questions
- A bank's historical-simulation 99% VaR, based on 500 daily observations, has a standard error of 0.40% of portfolio value. Risk management w…
- A portfolio manager models daily portfolio P/L as normally distributed with a mean of USD 0 and a standard deviation of USD 2 million. Using…
- For a spectral risk measure to be coherent, which condition must the risk-aversion (weighting) function satisfy?
- Which statement best describes an advantage of lognormal VaR over normal VaR for an unleveraged long position in a stock?
- A risk manager reports a one-day 99% VaR of USD 5 million. Which interpretation is correct?
- A portfolio manager models daily portfolio P/L as normally distributed with a mean of USD 20,000 and a standard deviation of USD 100,000. Us…