FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Liquidity Risk Management
A risk committee notes that its LVaR model adds a spread cost that is independent of trade size. Which limitation does this most directly expose?
A size-independent spread cost captures only exogenous liquidity and ignores endogenous liquidity, where a large sale moves prices against the seller. The model therefore understates liquidation costs for large or concentrated positions.
- AIt ignores endogenous liquidity, where larger trades move prices against the sellerCorrect
- BIt double counts the mid-price volatility
- CIt cannot be applied to equities
- DIt assumes spreads are negative in stress
Explanation
A spread cost that is independent of trade size reflects exogenous liquidity only. It omits endogenous liquidity risk, where selling large blocks pushes prices down, so the model can understate costs for concentrated positions.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Liquidity Risk Management shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Liquidity Risk Management questions
- During a market stress episode, many leveraged funds sell the same asset as prices fall, triggering margin calls that force further selling.…
- Which of the following is the best example of an exogenous liquidity cost, as opposed to an endogenous one, for a large asset manager?
- A bank has HQLA of 900 and gross stressed outflows of 1,200 over 30 days (USD millions). Contractual inflows from performing loans are 1,000…
- In a liquidation model, a trader holds 1,000,000 shares priced at USD 40. Selling x shares per day causes a temporary price concession of 0.…
- A bank has USD 400 million of unsecured wholesale funding maturing within 30 days and USD 600 million of stable retail deposits. Under its s…
- A portfolio manager holds a position in a corporate bond whose quoted bid is 98.40 and ask is 98.60. The manager uses the mid-price to mark …