Skip to content

FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Measuring and Monitoring Volatility

A risk manager notes that a GARCH(1,1) model fitted to an equity index has alpha + beta = 1.00 (omega = 0). Which statement is correct about the model's forecasts?

When alpha plus beta equals one with omega zero, GARCH becomes EWMA (integrated GARCH). There is no defined long-run variance and no mean reversion, so expected future variance stays at the current level rather than reverting or decaying to zero.

  1. AForecast variance does not mean-revert; the model is equivalent to an EWMA-type process with no long-run varianceCorrect
  2. BForecast variance reverts quickly to a positive long-run level
  3. CForecast variance converges to zero over long horizons
  4. DThe model gives a long-run variance equal to omega

Explanation

With alpha+beta = 1 and omega = 0 the model is IGARCH, i.e. EWMA. The long-run variance omega/(1-alpha-beta) is undefined, so there is no mean reversion and the expected future variance equals the current variance. It does not decay to zero.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Measuring and Monitoring Volatility shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Measuring and Monitoring Volatility questions