Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Art of Term Structure Models: Volatility and Distribution

A risk manager notes that in a lognormal short-rate model, as the current rate level falls from 6% to 1% with constant proportional volatility, what is the implication for the model's calibration to the market?

Because basis-point volatility equals σ times the rate, it shrinks sharply as rates fall from 6% to 1%. If real-market basis-point volatility stays fairly stable at low rates, the lognormal model understates rate risk there.

  1. ABasis-point volatility falls sharply, so the model may understate rate moves if markets show stable basis-point volatility at low ratesCorrect
  2. BBasis-point volatility rises sharply, so the model overstates risk at low rates
  3. CBasis-point volatility is unchanged, so the model fits any rate level equally
  4. DThe model forces rates to become negative, making low-rate risk undefined

Explanation

With basis-point volatility = σ·r, dropping r from 6% to 1% cuts it to one-sixth. If observed basis-point volatility stays relatively stable at low rates, the lognormal model understates risk. Rates never go negative in this model.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on The Art of Term Structure Models: Volatility and Distribution shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More The Art of Term Structure Models: Volatility and Distribution questions