FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Common Univariate Random Variables
A risk manager replaces a normal model with a fat-tailed model having the same mean and variance. Which outcome is most likely at very high confidence levels such as 99.9%?
At very high confidence levels the fat-tailed model usually gives a larger VaR than the normal model. Although the variances match, the heavier tails put more probability beyond extreme thresholds, pushing the extreme quantile outward. Equal variance does not mean equal tail quantiles.
- AThe fat-tailed VaR is typically larger than the normal VaRCorrect
- BThe fat-tailed VaR is typically smaller than the normal VaR
- CBoth models give identical VaR because the variances match
- DVaR becomes undefined for fat-tailed models
Explanation
With matched variance, fat-tailed distributions place more mass far in the tails, so quantiles at extreme confidence levels lie further out than the normal's. At moderate levels such as 95% the fat-tailed VaR can be smaller because of the more peaked center. Matching variance does not equalize quantiles.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Common Univariate Random Variables shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Common Univariate Random Variables questions
- A student t distribution with 5 degrees of freedom is used to model standardized returns instead of a normal distribution. Which statement i…
- X is discrete uniform on the integers 1 to n. A analyst states that the variance of X is 52.25 (that is, (n^2 - 1)/12 = 52.25). What is P(X …
- A risk analyst models daily P&L of a desk as independent draws from a distribution with mean 0.5 and standard deviation 4 (in USD thousands)…
- A risk manager models the number of loan defaults in a portfolio of 10 independent loans, each with a default probability of 0.10. What is t…
- Defaults in a portfolio follow a Poisson distribution with a rate of 2 per year. Assuming a constant rate and independence across periods, w…
- Which statement about the Central Limit Theorem as applied to the sample mean of i.i.d. observations with finite variance is correct?