Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Digital Resilience and Financial Stability: The Quest for Policy Tools in the Financial Sector

A risk officer argues that digital resilience policy should move beyond capital buffers. Which reasoning best supports this view?

Capital absorbs financial losses but cannot restore disrupted services or confidence, so policy also needs tools like recovery time objectives, resilience testing and incident response to keep critical functions operating. Capital alone is an incomplete defense against operational and cyber shocks that threaten stability.

  1. ACyber losses are always small, so capital is unnecessary
  2. BCapital absorbs losses but does not by itself restore services, so tools such as operational recovery requirements, testing and incident response are needed to keep critical functions runningCorrect
  3. CCapital requirements cannot be applied to any bank
  4. DResilience tools only matter for non-bank firms

Explanation

A cyber event's main stability harm is service disruption and loss of trust, which capital cannot fix directly. Hence complementary tools such as recovery objectives, scenario testing and incident response are emphasized. The other statements are false or overbroad.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Digital Resilience and Financial Stability: The Quest for Policy Tools in the Financial Sector shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Digital Resilience and Financial Stability: The Quest for Policy Tools in the Financial Sector questions