FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · The Art of Term Structure Models: Drift
A trader calibrates Model 1 (zero drift) to the current term structure by matching a single volatility to an option price. Later, the trader sees the model produce a one-year-ahead 95% range for the short rate of 2.00% ± 1.96σ, with σ = 90 bp. Which range is closest?
The range is 2.00% ± 1.96 × 0.90%, or about 0.24% to 3.76%. With zero drift, the expected rate stays at 2.00% and one-year standard deviation equals σ, 90 basis points, so the 95% band is ±176 basis points.
- A0.24% to 3.76%Correct
- B0.20% to 3.80%
- C1.10% to 2.90%
- D−0.10% to 4.10%
Explanation
With zero drift and T = 1 year, the standard deviation is 90 bp. 1.96 × 90 = 176.4 bp, giving 2.00% ± 1.764%, i.e. 0.236% to 3.764%, rounded to 0.24% to 3.76%. The 0.20 to 3.80 range uses a rounded multiplier of 2.0 (180 bp), which is less accurate.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on The Art of Term Structure Models: Drift shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More The Art of Term Structure Models: Drift questions
- In the Ho-Lee model with constant σ, the drift λ(t) implied by calibration to the initial curve equals the slope of the forward-rate curve p…
- Under Model 1, dr = σ dw, with σ = 90 basis points per year. A trader wants the standard deviation of the short rate over a 4-year horizon. …
- A lognormal short-rate model is specified as dr = a·r·dt + σ·r·dw (no mean reversion), with σ = 20% and a constant a. A trader notes that th…
- A trader notes that, in a no-arbitrage model with a normally distributed short rate, the model-implied price of a long-dated zero-coupon bon…
- A desk calibrates a constant-drift model so that λ matches the market price of the 5-year zero-coupon bond. The model then misprices the 2-y…
- In Tuckman's Model 1, the short-term rate follows dr = σ dw with no drift, where σ is constant and dw is a normal random variable with mean …