Skip to content

FRM Part II · FRM Exam Part II · Backtesting VaR

After a backtest, a bank classifies exceptions into those caused by a correct model experiencing an unusual event, and those caused by model weakness. Which finding would most clearly indicate a model integrity problem, rather than bad luck?

Exceptions concentrated in one asset class and traced to a missing risk factor in the mapping indicate a systematic model integrity problem. The other findings involve counts within the expected range or isolated shocks, which are consistent with a correct model experiencing bad luck.

  1. AA single exception on a day of an unprecedented market shock with a count within the expected range
  2. BExceptions that occur mostly on days when a particular asset class is traded, because its risk factor mapping omits a key factorCorrect
  3. CA count of 3 exceptions in 250 days at 99% confidence
  4. DAn exception following an overnight geopolitical announcement, with a total count in the green zone

Explanation

Exceptions concentrated in one asset class and traceable to a missing risk factor in the mapping point to a systematic model deficiency. The other options describe counts or events consistent with a correct model, so they suggest chance. Targeted fixes include adding the factor or improving the mapping.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Backtesting VaR shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Backtesting VaR questions