Skip to content

CFA Level I · CFA Level I Exam · Corporate Governance: Conflicts, Mechanisms, Risks, and Benefits

An analyst notes that a company has a dual-class share structure, a board dominated by the founder's relatives, and no independent audit committee. The analyst's most appropriate conclusion about the investment implications is that the company:

The company is likely exposed to higher governance risk that may warrant a higher required return. Concentrated voting control, a related-party board and no independent audit oversight weaken checks and expose minority shareholders to conflicts, so investors would typically demand compensation through a higher return or valuation discount.

  1. Ahas lower agency risk because the founder controls decisions
  2. Bis likely exposed to higher governance risk that may warrant a higher required returnCorrect
  3. Cwill benefit from stronger minority shareholder protection

Explanation

Concentrated control, a non-independent board and absent audit oversight weaken checks on management and expose minority shareholders to expropriation. Investors would typically demand a higher required return or apply a valuation discount. Founder control does not remove agency conflicts between controlling and minority holders.

Did you get it right without looking?

One question tells you little. A timed set on Corporate Governance: Conflicts, Mechanisms, Risks, and Benefits shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.

More Corporate Governance: Conflicts, Mechanisms, Risks, and Benefits questions