FRM Part I · FRM Exam Part I · Machine Learning and Prediction
An analyst uses ridge regression with one predictor and no intercept, where the predictor has been scaled so that the sum of x squared equals 50 and the sum of x times y equals 40. The ridge objective is the sum of squared residuals plus lambda times beta squared. With lambda = 30, what is the ridge coefficient estimate?
The ridge coefficient is 0.50. With one predictor and no intercept, beta equals the sum of xy divided by the sum of x squared plus lambda, so 40 divided by 80 gives 0.50. The OLS estimate of 0.80 ignores the penalty and is therefore too large.
- A0.50Correct
- B0.80
- C0.67
- D1.33
Explanation
The ridge estimate is beta = Sxy / (Sxx + lambda) = 40 / (50 + 30) = 0.50. The OLS estimate is 40/50 = 0.80, which is the unpenalized answer. Using lambda in the numerator or subtracting it (40/20 = 2.0) are errors.
Did you get it right without looking?
One question tells you little. A timed set on Machine Learning and Prediction shows your real accuracy, how long you take and where you lose marks.
More Machine Learning and Prediction questions
- A risk analyst at a bank has a historical dataset of 20,000 consumer loans. Each record contains borrower characteristics and a label showin…
- Which statement correctly contrasts agglomerative hierarchical clustering with K-means?
- A risk manager clusters customers on two variables: annual transaction volume (in USD, ranging 0 to 2,000,000) and number of late payments (…
- A data scientist has 5,000 observations and wants to select among several models and then report an unbiased estimate of final performance. …
- A data scientist increases the complexity of a prediction model by adding many more predictors and higher-order terms. Holding the training …
- A risk analyst wants to group a bank's corporate borrowers into clusters based on financial ratios, with no predefined default labels availa…